birding-aus
|
To: | |
---|---|
Subject: | Sooty Owl taxonomy |
From: | "Tony Keene" <> |
Date: | Wed, 04 May 2011 05:38:59 +0000 |
Looking through the Norman et al. paper, they used only one example from each of the three species/subspecies, so it's a very small set to make such a call from. On that note, would C&B have a problem with differentiating between Pomarine and Great Skuas, despite the distance in mitochondrial DNA being smaller than that seen in Sooty Owls (0.44% in the two skuas [1] compared with 0.4-0.8% in the owls). Just putting the cat amongst the pigeons (although I don't know the mtDNA distance between those). Cheers! Tony [1] Cohen et al. Proc. Roy. Soc. London. B, 1997, v264, p181-190: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1688246/pdf/9061968.pdf |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Sooty Owl taxonomy, Murray Lord |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Sooty Owl taxonomy, Andrew Taylor |
Previous by Thread: | Sooty Owl taxonomy, Andrew Taylor |
Next by Thread: | Sooty Owl taxonomy, Murray Lord |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU