Alan,
I might be a bit thick...(pauses for sniggering), but where would the
specimen that Linnaeus used for his study and naming, if it was
published in 1766. The Dutch explorers were more interested in mapping
the western coast, except for Tasman.
Dampier, though basically a pirate, did made copious notes on the
peoples and natural history, but on his first voyage, he ended up
being marooned on the Nicobar Islands and got back to England with
basically the clothes he stood up in and his journals. On his second
sojourn, he did hole up in Roebuck Bay, WA for a while and did collect
many natural history specimens, but his ship came to grief after he
left Australia, due to the normal rot and an incompetent ships
carpenter and he and his ship ended up aground on Ascencion Is after
taking water to a dangerous extent. He and his crew were marooned
until picked up by a Dutch ship. He managed to salvage a lot of his
charts and journals, but his specimen collection suffered somewhat.
Dampier's second and third circumnavigations were pretty much for
piracy, though he did do English literature a favour, by dropping off
Alexander Selkirk for a holiday on the second and picking him up on
the third.
All this makes me wonder if Linnaeus actually described a specimen
that came from the East Indies or New Guinea. The specimen that
Linaeus used, may still be in his collection which is held by the
Linnean Society in London. It would be interesting to do a DNA profile
on a feater from the specimen, if it still exists.
Cheers,
Carl Cliff
ord
On 10/11/2010, at 1:45 PM, Alan McBride wrote:
To quote C & B 2008....
Eastern Koel Eudynamys orientalis
C & B follows Mason (1997).
Under this division, the oldest available name for the species
occurring in Australia is orientalis Linnaeus, 1766, which has
priority over E. cyanocephalus Latham, 1801. This necessitates the
introduction of a new English name for E. orientalis. Mason (1997)
used the name Pacific Koel but as the species occurs throughout
eastern Indonesia, the Moluccas, New Guinea, northern Melanesia and
Australia, Eastern Koel is a more appropriate name.
Consequently the three species in the E. scolopaceus complex as
recognised here are:
E. orientalis (Eastern Koel);
E. scolopaceus (Asian Koel; southern Asia through to western Lesser
Sundas and the Philippines) and
E. melanorhynchus (Black-billed Koel; Sulawesi, Sula)
Hope this helps.
Alan
*******************************************************************************
Alan McBride, MBO.
Photojournalist | Writer | Traveller | +
Member: Australian Photographic Society
Travel Writers Association - Board of Directors
American Writers & Artists Inc.
International Travel Writers & Photographers Alliance
National Association of Independent Writers &
Editors
Travelwriters . com
Travcom New Zealand
Regional Representative Australia: Neotropical Bird Club
http://web.me.com/amcbride1
http://www.wildiaries.com
http://www.worldreviewer.com/member/alanmcbride/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/alanmcbride
http://www.twitter.com/alanmcbride
Good planets are hard to find; until we do, please, be green and read
from the screen
Tel: + 61 419 414 860
Fax: + 61 2 9973 2306
Skype: mcbird101
P O Box 190 | Newport Beach | NSW 2106 | Australia
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify
the sender. This e-mail is also subject to copyright. No part of it
should be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the prior written
consent of the copyright owner.
***********************************************************************************
On 10/11/2010, at 13:23 , Patrick Scully wrote:
Hi All,
After reading of the the reported Koel at Victoria Bridge, Richmond, I
poped
down there yesterday and heard a Koel calling (I recognised the call
after
hearing and seeing it in Newcastle) for around ten minutes. I didn't
have
the time to look further but it was on the East side of the river
(opposite
side to the bike track) just upstream of the bridge. later like the
other
person, I pondered on the correct name, as it was reported as both the
Eastern and the Austrlian Koel. My old Simpson and day calls it the
Common
Koel as does my Morcombe, Pizzey and Knight 8th Ed calls it the
Eastern Koel
and the most recent Simpson and Day (2010) calls it the Eastern (Common)
Koel. If it is now properly called the Australian Koel?, does this
mean that
it does not migrate to PNG and Indonesia?
Happy birding,
Patrick Scully
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
|
