G'day Chris
I have been off this list for a few years so may have missed an earlier
debate, but I was intrigued by your comment that " ...it would be extremely
unlikely to include rarities unless someone actually atlassed them, ...". I
am assuming that "atlassed" means submitted a record to the atlas project.
If a record was officially recognised as a rarity why would it *not *be
atlassed?
Happy New Year to all.
Martin Butterfield
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Chris Sanderson
<>wrote:
> Hi Laurie,
>
> BA would have this information at their fingertips (very easy to pull from
> the Atlas I think). I can't recall the figure being quoted at any stage,
> and it would be extremely unlikely to include rarities unless someone
> actually atlassed them, so it wouldn't be a complete list anyway.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, L&L Knight <
> >wrote:
>
> > It is interesting to see that BRBC maintains lists of all species seen in
> > the UK in each year. Does BA or another organisation keep similar
> records
> > for Australia?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/record-year-for-britains-twitchers-1852103.html
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,send the message:
> > unsubscribe(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to:
> > ===============================
> >
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
> ===============================
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
