birding-aus

Are Australian bird names a colonial hangover?

To: <>, AUS-Bird Webring <>
Subject: Are Australian bird names a colonial hangover?
From: Tony Crittenden <>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:07:49 +0000
Hi Laurie and Aus-birders



It is really not that suprising that many Australian birds were named that way. 
  They were all "new to science", and the only experience these collectors 
would have was from Europe, and possible Africa or India.  We all do the same 
thing when we see a new bird - describe it by comparing size, colouration, jizz 
to common birds that everyone knows.



I am sure that exaclty the same thing happened in Africa and Asia, but as these 
bird families were, in the main part, related and not segregated  like 
Australian Secies, they pretty much got it right.  (and  any passerine they 
couldn't place got called a Babbler!!)



Undoubtedly there would have been aboriginal names for birds - like the Maori 
names for birds in New Zealand.  Maybe we should use those??



cheers



Tony







Tony Crittenden
www.tcphotos.net
tcphotosdotnet.blogspot.com
Adelaide
South Australia





> From: 
> To: 
> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:03:34 +1000
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Are Australian bird names a colonial hangover?
>
> There seem to be relatively few groups of birds that predominantly
> occur in Australia that don't have names based on unrelated English
> analogues - robins, quail-thrush, shrike-thrush, wrens etc. Some of
> the exceptions would probably be honeyeaters, butcherbirds, currawongs.
>
> How many species in Australia are named after non-English analogues?
> That is, named after species that don't occur in England. Cockatiel
> is probably one.
>
> I think that the official common names reflect that fact that the
> people who named them in the nineteenth century were either English or
> English colonials. In contrast, the English names of the bird species
> in Peru are rarely based on European analogues. Like honeyaters,
> names actually describe the group of birds rather than comparing them
> to analogues.
>
> The Brush Turkey is a classic example of English mislabelling. Not
> only is it totally unrelated to European Turkeys, it's name is
> disconnected from the other megapodes. If it were correctly labelled,
> it would be some sort of Bushfowl (in line with Scrubfowl and
> Malleefowl).
>
> Regards, Laurie.
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================

_________________________________________________________________
A world FIRST in property search has arrived! Check out Domain Radar NOW!
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157631292/direct/01/==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU