birding-aus

FW: [Birding-Aus] Done It Again

To: <>
Subject: FW: [Birding-Aus] Done It Again
From: "Jeff Davies" <>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:14:12 +1000
G'day Tom,

 

I thought it best to answer your enquiry on the forum, I hope you don't
mind, because this issue is a perennial one not well covered in books apart
from HANZAB so I suspect there are a few people out there scratching their
heads on this.

Pallid Cuckoo is now placed in the genus Cacomantis along with Fan-tailed
and Brush Cuckoos which both have rufous juveniles, this is not the case
with Pallid though. Fresh Pallid juveniles are consistantly a distinctive,
somewhat boldly black and white bird with broad white fringes of the central
wing coverts forming a white panel on the folded wing, the rest of the bird
being variously spangled with broad white fringes and notches, they always
look like this. It lacks the bold yellow eye-ring of adults but has a fleshy
yellow gape not present on adults. Pallid females on the other hand are
quite variable, at their most extreme  they have rufous tones to broad
notches on wing feathers and tail as well as on collar and back of head, a
dark crown and scalloping in a collar that is often complete to the central
breast. The females also have the typical adult bright yellow eye-ring but
never a yellow gape. Female Pallid Cuckoos have been mislabeled as juvenile
in Australian books for decades and even some popular field guides have got
it completely wrong.

Also Geoff's bird could never be a juvenile because it has a mixture of
differently aged feathers especially obvious in the flight feathers.
Juveniles would have all feathers the same age  and at this time of the year
which is probably still a bit early for juvs but not absolutely, the
feathers would all be very fresh.

 

Cheers Jeff.

 

 

From: Geoffrey Jones  
Sent: Saturday, 5 September 2009 1:25 PM
To: Jeff Davies
Subject: FW: [Birding-Aus] Done It Again

 

 

 

From: Tom Tarrant  
Sent: Saturday, 5 September 2009 12:35 PM
To: Geoffrey Jones
Subject: Done It Again

 

Hi Geoff,

Interesting comments, (great image by the way!)

Having seen similar birds, I'd like to know why it was thought to be a
different colour-morph rather than a juvenile, did Jeff elaborate?

Tom

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Geoffrey Jones <>
wrote:

Good Morning All



                               Jeff Davies has politely pointed out that
the immature Pallid Cuckoo that I posted on the website is actually a Female
Adult Rufous Morph Pallid Cuckoo, so please except my apologise for my
inexperience Regards Geoff Jones http://barraimaging.com.au/index.php

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================




-- 
********************************
Tom Tarrant
Kobble Creek, Qld

http://www.aviceda.org

http://picasaweb.google.com.au/aviceda/
********************************

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • FW: [Birding-Aus] Done It Again, Jeff Davies <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU