Garrett concedes: extinction inevitable

To: "Baus" <>
Subject: Garrett concedes: extinction inevitable
From: "Graham Turner" <>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:25:48 +1000
G'day Birders,
this was in the news yesterday. It actually seems to make sense to me, rather 
than an admission of defeat.

Graham Turner

Full text below

Garrett concedes: extinction inevitable
Tom Arup, Environment Correspondent
August 18, 2009
THE Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, has warned that money to save 
endangered wildlife is limited and some species may have to be abandoned when 
funding decisions are made.

In one of the strongest speeches of his ministerial career he told an 
international conference of ecologists in Brisbane that the Government will 
shift its focus to protecting ''ecosystems'', rather than putting money into 
individual projects for endangered animals.

Mr Garrett's speech follows a report by the Department of Climate Change that 
found global warming would severely threaten many native species.

Mr Garrett said the current system of funding on an animal-by-animal basis was 
the equivalent of paramedics waiting at the bottom of a hill performing 
''triage'' on those who fall down.

''Australia has 1750 species now on the threatened list,'' he said. ''And while 
. we will have to act in an urgent way from time to time to prevent their 
extinction, it won't always be effective to keep tackling them one by one.''

Mr Garrett has already signalled his intentions with substantial budget 
injections to the national reserves system and new marine conservation zones.

At present Australia registers species on endangered lists based on the advice 
of the Threatened Species Scientific Committee. The minister then decides 
whether he will fund a ''recovery program'' for that species based on its 
chance of success.

Mr Garrett discussed his recent decision to fund a recovery program for an 
endangered bat on Christmas Island and whether he could afford to spend the 
money given the animal's low chance of recovery.

He asked the scientists to help policy makers and the community ''understand 
what is required in terms of public policy, resources and priorities''. He said 
his new approach was one of a ''clear-sighted pragmatist''.

Mr Garrett also pre-empted claims of future budget constraints on environmental 
spending by saying the financial crisis was the best time to address such 
issues because he was ''sufficiently aware that our wellbeing is inextricably 
linked to the health of our natural ecosystems''.

Averil Bones, policy director for the WWF, said moving to a broader protection 
program would require more money in next year's budget. She said Australia 
could not protect only existing ecosystems as most were under severe threat, 
and the environment had to be restored through revegetation programs and 
species protection.

Phil Gibbons, a senior fellow at the ANU's Fenner School of Environment and 
Society, said focusing on ecosystems was the most cost-effective approach to 
saving animals. But he said Mr Garrett had recently spent large amounts on 
programs for politically popular animals, including $10 million to help save 
the Tasmanian devil.

Mr Gibbons added that Mr Garrett and the Rudd Government had not yet been 
prepared to have a debate about ''the links between economic growth and the 
damage we are doing to our natural ecosystems''.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU