birding-aus
|
To: | "Phil & Sue Gregory" <>, "Birding Aus" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Not the Rufous Fantail |
From: | "Greg & Val Clancy" <> |
Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:51:05 +1100 |
Hi Phil,I don't want to sound too pedantic but when you used the term 'immature' did you really mean 'immature' or did you mean 'juvenile'. I agree that the bird is a Grey Fantail and would have said that it was a juvenile based on the heavy markings. If it is still in the plumage that it left the nest in it is a juvenile. If it has moulted it would be an immature. It is definitely a first year bird. Regards Greg |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Why do birders create State lists?, Denise Goodfellow |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fw: [Birding-Aus] Fwd: [Chough-chat] Images required, Barry McLean |
Previous by Thread: | Not the Rufous Fantail, Phil & Sue Gregory |
Next by Thread: | Mad dogs and Englishmen (and a few foolhardy birders) - a story of the second hottest day in Victorian meteorological history, Dr Richard Nowotny |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU