birding-aus

The power of digital photography for birds

To: Jill Dening <>, birding-aus <>
Subject: The power of digital photography for birds
From: Peter Shute <>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:42:48 +1100
"Keen, but not experienced enough yet", that's why I try to always carry a 
camera myself.  But carrying it isn't the end of the story, you have to know 
how to use it too.  It's very easy to let the autofocus and autoexposure get it 
badly wrong, and a few notes can be worth more than a photo.

I'd also like to point out that there are $500 cameras out there that can take 
photos good enough for id.

Peter Shute

________________________________________
From:   On 
Behalf Of Jill Dening 
Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2008 6:51 PM
To: birding-aus
Cc: Ivan & Joyce Fien; Barb Dickson
Subject: The power of digital photography for birds

Hi Everyone,

Yesterday I was leading three tinnies on a shorebird roost run up the 
Pumicestone Passage (SEQld, separates Bribie Is from the mainland). This is a 
regular run involving the Caloundra and Caboolture local government 
authorities. They provide boats and drivers and council people keen to learn, 
and with another shorebird specialist, I guide them through the labyrinth of 
mangrove-lined channels, covering about 10 or so roosts, where we conduct 
counts for the Qld Wader Study Group. There are so many places to go that we 
have to go in different directions here and there to cover all the roosts on 
the same tide. The purpose of taking non-environmental officers along is to 
show them the possible unconsidered effects of the planning or development 
decisions which they may make at their desks.

But yesterday my faithful shorebird offsider had a clash of commitments at the 
last moment, and I was reduced to sending to a couple of roosts two council 
people who were unable to identify all the species, especially the small 
species. Keen, but not experienced enough yet.

Suddenly I thought if they could photograph any birds they were unsure of, I 
could ID them later, as long as they got the numbers. And it worked! It meant I 
had to have faith that they wouldn't trip with a couple of thousand dollars 
worth of my photographic equipment, but they are careful people. The terrain is 
wetland at high tide.

So it makes me realise that people doing shorebird surveys don't really have to 
be conversant with all the species as long as they have a decent camera. Last 
night I was able to establish that they had Greenshank in the flock of 200 
Eastern Curlew which they found. And that the "Red-necked Stint" was in fact a 
female Red-capped Plover.

I was really stoked, and I mention it in case any of you finds yourself in the 
same situation sometime.

Cheers,

Jill

--
Jill Dening
Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia

26° 51' 41"S    152° 56' 00"E

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU