birding-aus

Bird Population Estimates Are Flawed -implications for Australia?

To: 'Stephen Ambrose' <>, 'Simon Mustoe' <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Bird Population Estimates Are Flawed -implications for Australia?
From: Peter Shute <>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:07:15 +1100
 wrote on :

> I've also done quite a lot of bird survey work in woodland
> remnants along the Hume Highway over the last 18 months. My
> general feeling is that most of the woodland birds in these
> remnants are habituated to traffic noise.
> However, a major problem is the impact of wind turbulence on
> these birds when large trucks or buses pass by.

But the ones that have been unable to get used to it wouldn't be there anymore, 
would they?

The types of noise may have different effects on different species too.  The 
steady roar of a jet is very different to the sharp clatter of a helicopter, 
for example.  Some noise regulations even take the extra annoyance of 
"impulsive" noises into account by deeming them to be several decibels higher 
than the measured levels.

Peter Shute==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU