birding-aus

The Ultimate Twitchathon

To: "L&L Knight" <>, "Birding Aus" <>
Subject: The Ultimate Twitchathon
From: "Chris Sanderson" <>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:55:49 +1000
Then there's the question of whether you include a species richness (total
number of birds that occur in an area) component to the calculation.  Is it
fair to compare Tasmania where 100 birds is a great list to North QLD where
200 birds is a great list and 100 birds is almost expected?  I know this has
been discussed before on Birding-Aus, so I won't go any further into it.
But you are starting to look at a lot of time and effort to try and get some
fair basis for comparison here.

Regards,
Chris

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:44 PM, L&L Knight <> wrote:

> Indeed.  The technical nature of the concept incorporating the difficulty
> in finding species would be just the thing to appeal to a TWITCHER [and
> would pave the way for a national competition].
>
> It could also open the way for a land and sea [pelagic] entry.
>
> Regards, Laurie.
>
>
> On 05/09/2008, at 1:34 PM, Chris Sanderson wrote:
>
>  If you wanted to get very technical, you could rate birds based on their
>> reporting rate (# times seen/number of surveys) modified by range using
>> the
>> Birds Australia Atlas.  This would give you how regularly they are seen,
>> but
>> would account for how much effort was spent searching, and where the bird
>> occurs.  For example it would do you no good rating a 40-spotted Pardalote
>> based on all the surveys in Tasmania, however if you just use the surveys
>> within its range you get a better idea of how hard it is to see.  Princess
>> Parrot would probably have a very high score, because even though there
>> are
>> few surveys in their habitat, there are probably far fewer that actually
>> have the parrot recorded.  I think this would be better than a simple
>> guess
>> as to how hard a bird is to see.  I does mean that rare birds found near
>> tourist hotspots will probably score less, and birders living in living
>> where a bird is marginal and very hard to see lose out.  But I doubt any
>> system is perfect!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:05 PM, John Tongue <> wrote:
>>
>>  Ooohh!  My aching head!
>>>
>>> John Tongue
>>> Ulverstone, Tas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/09/2008, at 12:39 PM, John Penhallurick wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Friends,
>>>
>>>> One easy way to weight species might be in terms of their ratings by
>>>> Birdlife International. Say, 5 for a species rated as CR (critical), 4
>>>> for
>>>> a
>>>> species rated as EN (Endangered), 3 for a species rated as VU
>>>> (Vulnerable),
>>>> 2 for a species rated as NT (Near-Threatened) and 1 for a species rated
>>>> as
>>>> none of the above.
>>>> Of course, this would not relate to the difficulty of finding the
>>>> species.
>>>> I would rate the Princess Parrot as one of the most difficult birds in
>>>> Australia to see, but its rating is only NT.  I think the answer might
>>>> be
>>>> for birders in a country to come up with their own ratings, combining
>>>> endangerment with difficulty of finding.
>>>> John Penhallurick
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: 
>>>>  On Behalf Of John Tongue
>>>> Sent: Friday, 5 September 2008 12:31 PM
>>>> To: L&L Knight
>>>> Cc: Birding Aus
>>>> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] The Ultimate Twitchathon
>>>>
>>>> Interesting thought, Laurie, but not without its difficulties, I
>>>> predict.  Forty-spotted Pardalotes would have to score high for me,
>>>> but maybe not so for someone living in Hobart, Kingston, or Bruny
>>>> Island, for instance.  And then, should my night parrot score more or
>>>> less than your Paradise Parrot?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe someone can come up with an acceptable list of scores?
>>>>
>>>> (meanwhile, don't forget our Great Tassie Twitch!)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> John Tongue
>>>> Ulverstone, Tas.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/09/2008, at 10:59 AM, L&L Knight wrote:
>>>>
>>>> John Tongue's Tassie Twitchathon invitation got me thinking of an
>>>>
>>>>> alternative to the traditional twitchathon model.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just as Rogaining is a points variation of orienteering, it should
>>>>> be possible to have a points version of the twitcherthon.  Common-as-
>>>>> mud species score 1, rarer and harder-to-find species score more.
>>>>> For example, a White-Throated Grasswren might score 20 in a NT
>>>>> competition, a Sooty Owl might score 5 in a Vic competition, and a
>>>>> Princess Parrot might score 50 in a WA comp.
>>>>>
>>>>> This way, there would be an incentive for people to chase species
>>>>> they normally wouldn't go after if they are simply trying to see the
>>>>> greatest number of species.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Laurie.
>>>>> ===============================
>>>>> www.birding-aus.org
>>>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,send the message:
>>>>> unsubscribe(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>>>> to: 
>>>>> ===============================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ===============================
>>>> www.birding-aus.org
>>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>>>> send the message:
>>>> unsubscribe
>>>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>>> to: 
>>>> ===============================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ===============================
>>> www.birding-aus.org
>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,send the message:
>>> unsubscribe(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>> to: 
>>> ===============================
>>>
>>>  ===============================
>> www.birding-aus.org
>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> send the message:
>> unsubscribe
>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>> to: 
>> ===============================
>>
>
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU