birding-aus

Re: Trawler bycatch problem

To: "Birding Australia" <>
Subject: Re: Trawler bycatch problem
From: "Terry Bishop" <>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:58:20 +1000
It does not matter how one plays with the numbers. The facts are;

More than 0 bycatch deaths are too many.
Bycatch deaths x number of fertile births lost x number of generations -
natural deaths is way too many.

Terry B




-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Tony Ashton
Sent: Thursday, 7 August 2008 8:20 PM
To: 
Subject: Re: Trawler bycatch problem

Hi all,

Trawler bycatch bird deaths must be fought against. But jumping from 30
deaths seen in five species (13 deaths; 11; 3; 2; 1) from 14 trawlers to
18,000 for a fishery seems to sum more as emotional overkill than 'crude
extrapolation'. Trying to draw meaning from samples 3; 2; and 1 seems
further to weaken the 'cause'. Any statisticians out there?

Meanwhile, spotted first Latham's Snipe of season in Ingham area today. And
the solo out-of-place Rufous Songlark is maturing well since turning up in
Tyto Wetlands on May 28.
Cheers, Tony Ashton  
==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===========

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU