birding-aus

Double-bars (Plovers)

To: "Birding-Aus" <>
Subject: Double-bars (Plovers)
From: "Robert Inglis" <>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:55:41 +1000
Apparently Double-barred Plovers do exist. At least one was reported (and photographed) at Western Treatment Plant (presumably in Victoria) on Sunday 19 th August 2007. This sighting seems to have been accepted without public comment. Perhaps they are common in that part of the world?
See:
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/birding-aus/2007-08/msg00534.html

If they were reported in Victoria by Victorian birders they would have to be fair dinkum, wouldn't they?

(I'd love to see the Rarities Report.)

BTW: Christidis and Boles did not use "common names" in either volume of their taxonomies of Australian birds. What they used are "English Names". Sounds a bit xenophobic but that's what those non-scientific suggested names are called in Australia. I would have preferred "Australian Names" but I guess that would make me appear xenophobic also. Further, those eminent scientists and authors did not decide which English names should be used. That task was taken on by The English Names Committee
of Birds Australia.
The fact that the taxonomy publications by Christidis and Boles use the suggested English names does not mean that birders must only use those names. It would be good and it would create less momentary confusion (a little longer for some) if all birders did use those suggested English names but no birder should be made to feel guilty for using local "common names" (English or otherwise) just because some birders believe they have certain superior qualifications which entitle them to dictate the behaviour and thought patterns of other birders.

Now, I've got an idea..........
The 'short-hand' 'common name' BFCS for Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike could be a good starting point to create a 4-character code for all of the birds of Australia. A list of 4 character abbreviations encompassing all of Australia's birds (and other creatures) could be devised to help birders in the field and make reports and lists less confusion, and obviate the need to use scientific names.
For example: Bar-tailed Godwit could be BAGO;
Black-tailed Godwit could be BLGO....

Wait a minute......that all sounds familiar!!

Ah.....yes! A female friend (yes, I do have a friend) recently sent me a copy of such a list which I believe is used by certain specialist (and highly secretive) birding (and other creatures) groups. I would love to make it freely available but I don't know where it originated and it is not complete.

Perhaps someone in the audience knows what I am talking about and could provide more information??

If no one knows what I am talking about, that's it, then. Sorry to have bothered anyone.

Think I'll go for a walk up to the letterbox.
I might see a Whistling-winged Pigeon or a Least Honeyeater or a Fish Hawk.

Cheers

Bob Inglis
(at the centre of the Universe)
Sandstone Point
Queensland
Australia

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Double-bars (Plovers), Robert Inglis <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU