Many Double-bars in breeding plumage

["Evan Beaver" <>]

I second that. There can be no argument with scientific names. And I
don't see why they're any harder to learn than commons.

On 7/21/08, Graham Turner <> wrote:
> Further to this is when an 'official' name change occurs, or is about to
> occur, there are many early adopters posting names that make little or no
> sense to the majority of birders.
>
> And while we are on it, very few bird books show 'Campbell's Albatross' for
> example, yet it is a widely used term. And don't if I understand correctly (
> I may well be wrong) a search through C+B might not help.
>
> Common names will always cause problems, should we start using species
> binomials?
>
>
> Cheers
> Graham Turner
>