Evan - the only reason you won't be ticking it is because you're too lazy to
get of your backside and see the thing mate!
So, you can't forget about taking the "ship assisted" high horse for a
canter on this one. Back into the stable please. If you saw it you'd tick
it.
Bergh!
On 27/03/2008, Evan Beaver <> wrote:
>
> Not that it matters in any way to me, but there's a hole in your logic
> Tony that seems to allow escapees and releases. But, as I've said
> before, tick what ever you see fit, it's your list, no-one else
> (should) care what's on it.
>
> I however won't be ticking it, and hope that it's destroyed before
> slinking off to find the rest of the House Crow secret society, lying
> in wait for sufficient numbers to arrive and begin breeding, and
> fulfil their ultimate goal of destroying all native avifauna.
>
> EB
>
> On 3/27/08, Tony Russell <> wrote:
> My stance is that if the bird is in Oz, no matter how it got here,
> then it's tickable, and no amount of contention as to it's mode of
> travel is relevant.
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
> ===============================
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
