birding-aus

Decline of small waders

To: Birding Aus <>
Subject: Decline of small waders
From: L&L Knight <>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:44:02 +1000
What proportion of waders are flagged? For leg flagging to be a major cause of the decline in small waders, a large proportion of those waders must be flagged. I would think that the reduction in the number of birds is considerably greater than the number of birds that have been flagged.

Perhaps Phil Straw can provide estimates of the number of birds in each species of wader that have been flagged, and the proportion of the wader populations that have been flagged.

Regards, Laurie.

On Thursday, October 4, 2007, at 09:46  AM, Marilyn Davis wrote:


Hello Birding-AusersThe following link describes the major cause for decline of our small waders.http://www.shorebirdnetwork.org/leg_flags.htmlVery good, isn't it. Imagine two large leg flags and a metal band on a phalarope (relies on its legs to swim), a sanderling (needs its legs to run) or a stint (needs its legs to walk through floating algae). Make no mistake; impact on targeted rare and endangered waders from this destructive practice is just as bad as any random habitat destruction.


<snip>

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU