A Carbon Neutral Twitchathon

To: "'Peter Ekert'" <>, <>
Subject: A Carbon Neutral Twitchathon
From: "Tony Russell" <>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:33:45 +0930
I've never bothered going on a twitchathon, but wouldn't it be easier to
just have people respond to an appeal for funds over this forum or

Personally I couldn't be stuffed ( twitcher though I may be) to waste a
day burning up litres of fuel ( with whatever that does to the
environment), but I would contribute 5 or 10 dollars to an environmental
Here's an idea - how about people contribute 5c once a year to every
bird on their life lists.  Give it to Birds Aust ( strictly for
conservation, not their general revenue).

So people with a 500 bird life list put in $25 - cheaper and cleaner
than they'd spend on a twitchathon.  

Crikey, what have I said !!    I'd be up for $36.55.  Our top twitcher
would contribute $39.55


-----Original Message-----
 On Behalf Of Peter Ekert
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:50 AM
Subject: A Carbon Neutral Twitchathon

Michael Todd and Chris Sanderson's preliminary thoughts and ideas on
improvements to the twitchathon are a breath of fresh air.

For a long time, I have considered the twitchathon a bit of a yawn
really.  It's an outdated concept.  Having a long-term involvement in
acquiring money and undertaking conservation projects (in a past life
with Birds Australia and currently with the Hunter-Central Rivers
Catchment Management Authority), I don't deny that the twitchathon has
an important role in raising money for conservation projects and birding
groups.  In its current form, despite some media coverage in recent
times, it really doesn't have a role in raising awareness in the local
community.  Most Joe Public's haven't and people within the
conservation/nature community haven't heard of the Twitchathon.  

But, surely there are better ways of raising money for conservation
projects, not for profit organisations and/or fostering awareness of
birds within the community then having a group of like-minded bird
lovers driving fuel guzzling, greenhouse gas emitting 4WD's, loaded up
with camping equipment and the like across parts of their respective
state. It's a bit of a contradiction really. In recent times,
particularly in this forum, the twitchathon has been more about bragging
rights for teams than raising funds for conservation, education or

If the twitchathon is to continue in its current form, then the use of
solar/electric powered vehicles, bicycles, and walking as forms of
transport and the use of recycled materials for scribing and/or the use
of recycled, environmentally friendly clothing or nudity (check laws in
your own state) and/or the purchase of carbon credits and/or the
preliminary assessment and inclusion of biodiversity
offsets/compensatory habitat is recommended.  Another recommendation is
that local businesses/community groups actively participate in the
event, rather than just sponsoring.  Teams could approach local
businesses or community groups to recruit/have on board a guest team
member, one who is not a bird watcher per se but more a local business
person/member of another community group.   Every team is required to
have one of these people.  These people report back to their
business/community group of their twitchathon experience and overtime,
this may ultimately raise the awareness of the event within the greater


Peter A. Ekert
Senior Threatened Species Officer
Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC)

Ph.  (02) 49384950  Fx.  (02) 49301013 

Hunter-Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority
Private Bag 2010

>>> Michael Todd <> 11/04/2007 8:32 pm >>>

Hello all,

Writing as a former Whacked-out Woodswallow I'll have to be careful how 
I respond to this one!

First of all, I congratulate the woodswallows for making an effort to 
alleviate the greenhouse impacts of the twitchathon (well, their part in

it anyway). My hat (if I was wearing one) goes off to you.

Sure, the fundraising side of things is important and is the original 
idea for the competition. But I don't think there's any harm in some 
healthy competition and a bit fun as well. They can be compatible.

However, I kind of agree with Keith Brandwood on the competition side of

things. In NSW at least (I can't speak for the other states), I think 
the twitchathon, as a competition has become a bit regimented. To be in 
with a competitive chance of winning, identifying the maximum number of 
species in the 24 hrs, and thus raising more money, there are very few 
possible routes that can be taken. And to get the count of ~230 species 
a lot of driving is required, thus chewing up considerable fuel, 
churning out greenhouse gases etc. You cannot get this high a count in 
NSW without visiting most of the major habitats in NSW, in particular 
covering inland wetlands, woodlands, coastal forests and wetlands etc. I

believe that to be competitive there is only one approximate geographic 
route that can be taken.

I reckon that the twitchathon should be shaken up a bit by providing new

rules and incentives to teams to twitch in different ways some of which 
could be more climate- change friendly. Just about all teams would end 
up with a Silver Gull on their list. However, not all teams would end up

with Square-tailed Kite. What about a system where different bird 
species scored more highly than the abundant ones. What about a bonus 
system for getting the full swag of a particular suite of birds- say all

the thornbills? With enough tinkering you could possibly get a system 
that would bring the states onto an even basis so that we could have a 
true Australian competition (I think Stuart Cooney might have looked at 
this with the last twitchathon).

If a score of 500 became the average winning total there might be 
numerous ways in which to get there and a myriad of different strategies

would develop, some of which might not have to involve driving thousands

of kilometres. The twitchathon could become more fun, more competitive, 
have a higher profile, attract more competitors and ultimately raise 
more funds!

Anyway, its just an idea!  Anyone have any other suggestions?


Mick Todd


Michael Todd
Wildlifing- Images of Nature-
Ranelagh, Tasmania
Latest Additions: Updated Australian Mammals Gallery
Mobile: o41o 123715

Carol Probets wrote:

> Hi all,
> I followed the recent thread on Twitchathons with interest, and my
> intention here is not to start up the discussion again as most of the 
> points on both sides of the argument have already been made. I 
> refrained from posting at the time because I wanted to run an idea 
> past my team leader David Geering, who was away from contact over
> I've now done that and am able to say that this year, the Whacked-Out
> Woodswallows will run a "carbon neutral race" by purchasing carbon 
> credits to offset our own travelling associated with the event, from 
> one of the organisations involved in genuine carbon-reducing projects 
> (not just sequestration). For a list of such organisations see: 
> We're fully aware that this does not exempt us from all blame nor
> eliminate the emissions from our own travelling during the event. But 
> I do hope it will go some way towards a satisfactory compromise. On 
> the one hand it's the extreme nature of the Twitch that grabs people's

> attention and makes this such a successful fund-raising event. It 
> provides enjoyment for many more than just the actual competitors. On 
> the other hand it's that same resource-hungry nature of the race which

> eats at our consciences and leaves us open to the sort of criticism 
> brought up in the recent discussion.
> So this is only a small gesture but I hope it sets an example to other
> teams, especially those like us who do what has been dubbed a "double 
> twitch" in order to be competitive and have a chance at the main
> Hey, nobody's perfect, and this is a once-a-year event which raises a
> substantial amount of funds for a good conservation cause. Let's all 
> do the best we can without abolishing our sense of fun.
> cheers,
> Carol Probets
> Whacked-Out Woodswallow
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe 
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:  ===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:  ===============================


To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU