DNA based lumps, splits and IDs

To:	"Dave Torr" <>, "L&L Knight" <>
Subject:	DNA based lumps, splits and IDs
From:	"Graham Buchan" <>
Date:	Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:21:45 +1100

Dave,

The figures used are percentages rounded to the neaest 0.1% - ie if the DNA
was 99.96% it would be shown as 100.0%. The point is that the DNA is only
very marginally different.

Cheers,

Graham Buchan

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, L&L Knight DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Dave Torr DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, L&L Knight DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Dave Torr DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, L&L Knight DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Paul Taylor DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Graham Buchan <= DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Frank Rheindt DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Dave Torr DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Andrew Hobbs DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Frank Rheindt DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Alan Gillanders

Previous by Date:	DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Paul Taylor
Next by Date:	DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Frank Rheindt
Previous by Thread:	DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Paul Taylor
Next by Thread:	DNA based lumps, splits and IDs, Frank Rheindt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU