"Hugo Phillipps" <>, "Peter Shute" <>, <>
Lore or lores?
"Mike Carter" <>
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:32:23 +1100
Whether to use the singular or the plural with regard to parts of a bird is
a question which troubles me every time I write a description for
dissemination to others. Especially if it's intended for publication.
Particularly troublesome is the word 'supercilium'. It is used throughout
HANZAB and most text books yet birds have one each side of the head so
surely it should be 'supercilia' (see e.g. Australasian Pipit in Vol 7 Part
B p. 1359)? But to say the supercilia are white implies to me that there two
or more each side of the head! Not very clear so I prefer the 'wrong' HANZAB
option. Furthermore, if describing a bird flying past where only one side
was seen to be honest I must use 'supercilium' in my description. If I
describe the presence of 'supercilia', I am assuming both sides of the bird
are similar, usually the case of course, but not always as moult may not
progress symmetrically at the same rate.
I'm sure I've said this before but it reminds me of the two judges on a
train passing a paddock of sheep. The junior judge observes that the sheep
are newly shorn. The senior judge adds the rider, 'Well at least on the side
30 Canadian Bay Road
Mount Eliza VIC 3930
Tel (03) 9787 7136
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: