birding-aus

Bird Calls and Hemlines

To: Julian Bielewicz <>, birding aus <>
Subject: Bird Calls and Hemlines
From: Russell Woodford <>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:12:37 +1100
Brilliant!

I think this timely response and summary is the most fitting we can
expect to a "last word" on the matter.



Russell Woodford
Birding-Aus List Owner

Geelong   Victoria   Australia
http://www.birding-aus.org



On 15/01/2007, at 12:39 AM, Julian Bielewicz wrote:

Over many years of birding, both Down Under and back Up Above, I
have often
viewed the trends in our pastime much as one would perhaps see
fashion fads
in the length of ladies’ skirts. When I was a younger soul, with much less
around the middle and a lot more on top- and Cannock Chase was my
stomping
ground for birds not necessarily of the feathered genre- it was
considered
rather bad form to even be seen with a field guide.   Real birders
used only
their binoculars and a notebook in which they recorded details of
any bird
not immediately recognized out in hedge or briar.  Books were only
consulted
after the outing, back in the library, or, more likely, at the
local with a
pint of the landlord’s best bitter to sup while considering the
various
nuances of plumage, or other characteristic details that separate one
species from a agonizingly similar conspecific.  Anything else
would have
been viewed as unseemly.

Much as when ladies carried their skirt hems below their ankles.
Even the
hint of exposed stocking would have raised eyebrows, set tongues
wagging.
Reputations were scandalized on less.

I note with interest Peter’s mention of 'RememBird’, an electronic notebook one takes out into the field. And yet it has overtones. It can be armed with birdcalls and that may be akin to offering a ketchup-smothered hotdog
to a delegate of the Slow Food Society.

Some time later in my birding career I came across the first of the pishers
and whistlers or those who preferred to suck on the back of their
hand.
They rambled up dale and down vale and never saw where their feet
trod, or
what their feed trod in.  Ladies’ hemlines rose above the ankle.

It wasn’t long after this that I was introduced to the scrap of
polystyrene
and a chard of broken glass.  Rubbed together they were a total
failure to
any respectable arsonist but could induce the odd bird or two to
break cover
for a fleeting moment to see the latest circus in AviTown.  Ladies
calves
were becoming visible beneath their hemlines.

Where there’s a perceived need there’s a capitalist prepared to exploit the
niche.  Some might prefer the adage that necessity is the mother of
invention.  Whichever agrees better with your palate, the practice of
attracting birds to artificial calls encouraged the Audubon
squeakers to
flood the market. And yes, Bob, I still have mine, attached to the strap of my binoculars. Hemlines rose to the knee but it is the devil’s own job
locating those small plastic vials of resin needed to revitalize
drying
timbers.

As technology advanced so we had the bird call tapes and all one
needed was
a portable player.  At one point it came close to absurdity.  The
challenge
was not so much whether or not one could recognise the call of a
particular
species but whether one could distinguish the Real McCoy from the
myriad of
frantic twitchers belting decibels of Pitta calls out into the
rainforest.
The era of the midi skirt had arrived.

And so we have come to the ipod and its ilk.  The mini skirt!

Tastes remain personal.  As a young man I was always attracted to
women in
minis.  As an older man… Some moralists have always loathed the
shortening
of the hemline, as if the two were somehow inversely linked - the
higher the
hemline, the lower the moral standard.  Using calls to attract
birds seems
to be encountering similar trade winds and it depends on the tack
of your
boat as to whether it is the best thing since sliced bread or the
devil’s
own concoction.

I very much doubt whether those who don’t will ever be convinced
that they
should or those that do be persuaded that they shouldn’t.  In a
pastime
without official referees or rules set in concrete each birder will proceed in whatever manner they feel most comfortable with. After all some birders
can twitch television programs – and set themselves strict
guidelines as to
what is or is not ‘tickable’-.  Who are we to say them nay?

In the end I suspect that the words of Simon King may be a reasonable
compromise.  His advice is to use the recorded call up until such
time as
you hear the first response and then stop – never to repeat the
recording.

Simon King, alongside the delightful Kate Humble, assists Bill
Oddie with
the Springwatch and Autumnwatch programs produced by the BBC- and
therein
lies another tale of what can be done to attract the average person in the
street to take an active interest in wildlife.

Julian



===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU