OK,
I'm going to make a total goose of myself twice by asking two questions:
In a posting dated "Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:13:07 -0800 (PST)" Tun Pin Ong provided some links to his
very good images.
My question 1: Which bird in each of the photos containing more than one bird are we supposed to be
looking at?
In a posting dated "Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:27:56 +1100" Jeff Davies said:
"G'day Tun Pin,
Your stint does indeed look like a good candidate for little Stint,.......... ."
Cheers Jeff Davies."
My question 2: Why?
Obviously I haven't yet seen a Little Stint, at least, to the best of my
knowledge.
But I have seen more than a few Red-necked Stints.
Recently I took well over 100 photos of the 'local' Stints and, on reviewing the images, I noticed a
visible variation in plumage, the bill shape and size, and the apparent leg length amongst the
birds.
I assumed this was due to: viewing angle, variations in the light, age differences in the birds,
differences in the rate of change from "breeding" to "non-breeding" plumages.
Perhaps I am making unfounded assumptions.
Interestingly, HANZAB states (under Red-necked Stint) that the call is "easy and safe way to
distinguish Little from Red-necked".
However, "Shorebirds" (Hayman, Marchant, Prater 1986) says (also under Red-necked Stint): "Calls are
very similar to those of Little Stint and generally of little value in separating these two
species".
I am curious as to how the experts identify Little Stint in the field.
Cheers
Bob Inglis
Sandstone Point
Qld.
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
