In addition to Alström and Mild (2003), Pavlova et al. (2003) used DNA
sequences to confirm that Motacilla flava as conventionally delimited is not
monophyletic. There are at least three species-level taxa involved: nominate
flava, tschutschensis and taivana.
Schodde and Mason (1999), in the Directory, noted that there appear to be three
plumage types recorded in this country and several forms could occur here as
vagrants. They also remarked that identifications of none of the records
(including specimens) is satisfactorily confirmed. So, which forms of flava
occur as vagrants in Australia? The eastern forms recorded from Indonesia and
New Guinea, and likely to occur in Australia, are not part of the lineage
containing the nominate flava. Instead, these represent either, or both, of
two species, M. tschutschensis and M. taivana.
If anyone has good observations/photographs of these birds, then it would be
very useful to have this information, together with a good critical discussion
of the characters and records, get into the primary literature. I know folks
have firm ideas of which forms they have seen. Now get it into print!
Pavlova, A., Zink, R.M., Drovetski, S.V., Red'kin, Y. and Rohwer, S. 2003.
Phylogeographic patterns in Motacilla flava and Motacilla citreola: Species
limits and population history. Auk 120: 744-758
From: Mike Carter
Sent: Monday, 15 May 2006 9:51 PM
To: Edwin Vella; BIRDING-AUS
Cc: BAXTER, RICHARD; David James; Tony Palliser; Alan Morris; Walter Boles;
John Darnell; Sean Dooley; Bill Ramsay; Frank O'Connor
Subject: Rare Birds on Cocos; Macronyx Yellow Wagtail
Following the report of the observation by Richard Baxter on Cocos (Keeling)
Island, Edwin Vella asked 'Is the macronyx Yellow Wagtail a full species? If it
is, what other species of Yellow Wagtail have been split?"
Well as always, it depends on the taxonomy you choose to follow. Even the
recent Pipits & Wagtails, the ultimate reference by Alstrom & Mild, (2003)
Helm, wasn't definitive. It treated the Yellow Wagtail as a single species
with, if I can count, 13 subspecies, some with various forms, but then said
molecular data suggest they should be split into two groups, 'Western' and
'Eastern' forms, OR into nine or more species! So far as Australia is concerned
only the three subspecies comprising the Eastern group have so far been claimed
or recorded. These are tschutschensis (which absorbs simillima), taivana, and
macronyx. Alternatively these could be regarded as three separate species. So
we await the next Christidis & Boles.
Unfortunately, macronyx resembles thunbergi (of the 'Western' group) so closely
that it 'is not diagnosable by plumage, morphometrics or voice' (A & M page 285
and elsewhere) but DNA data says it is different! Either or both could occur in
Australia. Since thunbergi has a more northerly breeding distribution, I think
it a more likely vagrant to Australia especially for an occurrence in May as
they migrate later. However, Schodde & Mason (1999) CSIRO, followed Mees
(1982), in accepting macronyx from central Asia as the more likely taxon, so
changed the initial identification of a Yellow Wagtail seen at Richmond (NSW I
suppose) (Australian Birds 1979). Both winter in the Oriental region and
according to Alstrom & Mild, thunbergi breeds not only further north but also
further east than macronyx. S & M considered thunbergi a northwest Eurasian
form and therefore of unlikely provenance. Not so apparently.
Fortunately, Richard has numerous excellent photos of this beast.
Unfortunately, I dipped! BUT GOT HIS CHINESE POND HERON now believed to have
gone. I'd seen it within 29 hours of Richard's gratefully received call to my
home in Victoria!
30 Canadian Bay Road
Mt Eliza VIC 3930
Ph: (03) 9787 7136
The Australian Museum.
Australia's first - and leading - natural sciences and anthropology museum.
The views in this email are those of the user and do not necessarily reflect
the views of the Australian Museum. The information contained in this email
message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential and is for the
intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any
attached files is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete it and notify the sender. The Australian Museum does not guarantee the
accuracy of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. As
Internet communications are not secure, the Australian Museum does not accept
legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)