birding-aus

Tawny Frogmouths

To: "Philip Veerman" <>
Subject: Tawny Frogmouths
From: Peter Pfeiffer <>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:40:23 +1030
At 05:50 PM 3/20/2005 +1100, you wrote:
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1 = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags">
Ah yes Tony but the feet of owls are VERY different to the feet of nightjars (the frogmouth of course being of the latter group and not at all close to an owl). So a Boobook perching on the wires of a Hills hoist is unremarkable but a Frogmouth is quite another story.
 
Owls have strong zygodactyl (two toes forward & two toes backward) feet used for catching prey and nightjars don't. The feet of any ORDER of birds are generally quite different to the feet of any other ORDER of birds but this is especially so comparing owls' feet to the feet of nightjars. As in number, direction, location of attachment and form of toes, presence or absence of full or partial webbing and which toes it includes. This point is one of the many, sadly lost on the many people that like to think of Families as the major subdivisions of birds.
 
Philip
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU