birding-aus
|
To: | |
---|---|
Subject: | Sequence of Orders and Families |
From: | Steve <> |
Date: | Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:24:25 +1100 |
G'day all My two bob's worth: Field guides should incorporate the latest available taxonomy.This helps birders to gain a better understanding of a whole range of bird biology - often without their realising it. If there are similar but unrelated species then there is no reason why an extra species can't be added to a plate out of sequence and some discussion be included in the text. Otherwise, keep to the current accepted taxonomy. Books which use weird ordering are rarely successful and they make comparisons with field guides from other countries more problematic. Cheers Steve Clark Hamilton, Vic -------------------------------------------- Birding-Aus is now on the Web at www.birding-aus.org -------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message 'unsubscribe birding-aus' (no quotes, no Subject line) to |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Sequence of Orders and Families, knightl |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Grey Butcherbirds around Melbourne., menorris |
Previous by Thread: | Sequence of Orders and Families, knightl |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sequence of Orders and Families, Frank O'Connor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU