Why would there have been more predators, let
alone "many many more predators" in the past, than the number present
in the last million or so years (during which the pied appearance presumably
developed)? The ratio of numbers of predator to prey (for endotherms and
ectotherms) is fairly constant through time. It is one of the factors that has
been used in the dinosaur endothermy debate (going back 100 million or so
years). One could ask why are birds pied just as much as why are they brown.
There does not need to be a reason. The most obvious birds in the open areas of
Australia are black (ravens), white (cockatoos) or pied (magpies). They live
very successfully in the same climate and temperature conditions, so the
patterns would appear to be fairly unimportant, except for evolutionary accident
setting up social signalling for homogeneity of each species.
Philip
-----Original Message----- From:
Mark Newton - Adelaide, SA <> To:
Philip A. Veerman <>; birding aus
<> Date:
Wednesday, 25 February 2004 18:45 Subject: Re: [BIRDING-AUS]
another difficult question black and white colouring
The birds mentioned make themselves conspicuous
today, but during the evolution of this colour variation many many more
predators would have prevailed in a very different world making camo an
important trait for even the boldest creatures.
Certainly an interesting question with a myriad
of possible answers.
Cheers
Mark
|
Admin
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address:
andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU
|