Re; Escapers versus wild birds.

To: "Birding-aus" <>
Subject: Re; Escapers versus wild birds.
From: knightl <>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 18:49:02 +1000
Well, seeing this is an Australian newsgroup, the Macquarie Dictionary is the bible.

Its definition of escapee is "n. one who has escaped, as from
internment, imprisonment, etc".  So feel free to continue to refer to
birds that have escaped from captivity as escapees.

To be fair, the Maquarie also lists escaper as the noun of escape. For what it is worth, the latin basis for escape is ex cappa -> ex cloak.

Regards, Laurie.

On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 06:08  PM, Paul Walbridge wrote:

Philip Veerman wrote;
By the way, the plural of escapee is escapees, DEFINATELY NOT
escapee's (which only makes sense followed by a noun, to mean some
property of the escapee). Also by usual grammar, one who escapes
should be called an escaper (even if that word is not generally used).
The escapee is the one to whom an escape occurs, that is the prior owner. If the bird is released, the bird is a releasee and the person releasing it is a releaser.
Thanks Philip,  for your usual interesting discourse on this forum, one LITTLE  bone to point out though. Whilst on the subject of  grammar & YOU are making a point here, shouldn't one say 'DEFINITELY NOT' escapees. Cheers, not trying  to be boring - Paul Walbridge.

Birding-Aus is on the Web at
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU