Perhaps we could put it round the other way...
"The pro-wildlife groups have rightly questioned allowing dogs in reserves,
and call for proof that dogs are not responsible for negative impact on
wildlife."
Scott O'Keeffe
-----Original Message-----
From:
Behalf Of Andy Burton's
Bush Tours
Sent: 13 September 2002 16:13
To:
Subject: Dogs in reserves
Hi everyone,
an attempt to keep dogs out of a small number of reserves in the
Willoughby Municipality in northern Sydney looks like developing into
a major controversy.
About 10% of the original bush remains in the municipality and of
this the majority is in small, degraded reserves. These reserves are
important havens for local and visiting fauna.
Dogs on leads are allowed in these reserves but it is planned to stop
this in some of those reserves.
The pro dog group rightly questions what damage do dogs do in
reserves and calls for proof.
Is anyone aware of any studies of dogs in reserves especially, but
not solely, relating to dogs accompanied by people. Is it known, for
instance, whether the presence of dog scent has a detrimental effect
on the birds and other fauna in a reserve?
In a slightly perverse way I should also ask whether there have been
studies on the beneficial effects of dogs in reserves?
Please contact me directly.
Andy
--
Andy Burton's Bush Tours
52 Abingdon Rd,
Roseville,
NSW 2069
Australia
Ph 61 2 9416 2636
Mob 0408 937 531
Birding-Aus is on the Web at
www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
to
Birding-Aus is on the Web at
www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
to
|
