I understand some of the worries about European bees - not
least that, as social insects, they have an organised and
painful response to human interference !
However the Victorian Environment Conservation Council has
the impossible(?) task for an advisory body of making
recommendations which "balance" social and environmental
concerns: it is supposed to be both scientific and
political.
It recommended MORE protection after the draft report but I
am not sure how much of its final recommendation have been
accepted by the State government (despite their sounding
friendly towards it).
Anyhow, I guess one of the balancing tricks was about how
many interest groups to take on: loggers, miners and people
fossicking for minerals, livestock owners.. Perhaps it was
wise to leave the apiarists/bee keepers until later. After
all the government is (hooray!) currently tacking the
problem of excess logging in other parts of the state.
The box-ironbark bill is scheduled for the spring session.
PLEASE tell the pollies that they should accept the EEC
recommendations - and similarly the recommendations for the
Marine Parks and Sanctuaries. I understand the bill, due to
go up this session, could still include Ricketts Point (and
Cape Howe?) if there is enough pressure.
Michael Norris
Birding-Aus is on the Web at
www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
to
|