birding-aus

Gunnedah submissions needed now

To:
Subject: Gunnedah submissions needed now
From: David Stewart <>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:08:34 +1000
>
>Subject: Gunnedah submissions needed now
>Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:36:04 +1000
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
>
>The so-called EIS for the proposed Gunnedah Charcoal Plant is currently on
>exhibition.  Attached are list of possible points for submissions, please
>network far and wide and start getting those letters in.
>
>
>Text version below:
>
>STOP THEM INCINERATING YOUR FORESTS
>DO SOMETHING TODAY TO SAVE A TREE (OR SEVERAL MILLION
>TREES)
>WRITE A LETTER OBJECTING TO THE GUNNEDAH CHARCOAL PLANT
>
>A charcoal plant is proposed for Gunnedah. It will
>consume 230,000 tonnes of wood a year for the next 40
>years. The charcoal will then be taken to Lithgow and
>used to make silicon metal. Trees will initially be
>sourced from public lands in north-east NSW from the
>Hunter Valley north, and from private lands on the New
>England Tablelands and inland. In a few years western
>public lands will also be incorporated, including the
>Pilliga - the largest expanse of western woodland
>remaining.
>
>If you think it is a dumb idea to burn our native
>forests for charcoal, then add your voice to those of
>us putting our objections in writing.  All you have to
>do is write to:
>Department of Urban Affairs and Planning
>Development and Infrastructure Assessment
>GPO Box 3927
>Sydney, NSW, 2001
>
>Mark your letter to the attention of Scott Jeffries
>(ref. DA No. 248-07-00).  Then say you object to the
>proposed Gunnedah charcoal plant because: (you can use
>some of these reasons, or give whatever reasons you
>want)
>
>1. The north-east forests are amongst the most
>biodiverse in the world and the proposal is a direct
>threat to the survival of many rare and inadequately
>reserved ecosystems and species.
>2. It is unacceptable that oldgrowth forests are still
>being logged and are intended to be targeted for
>charcoal.
>3. Ironbarks are extremely important nectar sources for
>a variety on native birds and insects, despite the fact
>that these are to be one of the principal timbers
>targeted there has been no attempt to identify the
>impacts of removing ironbarks from the western
>woodlands, particularly on endangered species such as
>the Regent Honeyeater.
>4. The so-called EIS fails to meet the Director-
>General's requirements and detail where the wood is
>coming from and what types of wood will be required.
>5. It is misleading to call the timber being used
>'forest waste' as there is no intent to use only
>genuine sawmill waste but rather to just cut down more
>trees.
>6. Logging in north-east NSW's public forests is
>already recognised as being unsustainable, this
>proposal will compound this problem and provide an
>incentive to increase clearfelling.
>7. Private land logging for charcoal is proposed to be
>undertaken, yet the EIS fails to identify where this is
>to happen, the volumes involved or even mention the
>environment to be affected or impacts that will result.
>8. Private land logging in western NSW is virtually
>unregulated, and this project gives farmers an
>incentive to cut down trees that are more important as
>a salinity buffer and fauna habitat.
>9. Contrary to the Director General's requirements, the
>EIS doesn't identify which sawmills will be processing
>the wood, how much they will be processing, or the
>transport routes to and from the mills.
>10. Without accurate identification of trucking routes
>it is impossible to assess how rural communities will
>be affected by increased degradation of local roads and
>decreased road safety.
>11. It is unacceptable that rural ratepayers are going
>to subsidise the company by paying for increased road
>maintenance.
>12. The EIS  doesn't fully assess the greenhouse
>impacts of the proposal and makes no attempt to
>identify means of compensating for the increased
>emissions of CO2 that will result.
>13. There are alternatives to converting native forests
>to charcoal - such as using plantation timber, making
>genuine waste wood into briquettes or using ultra clean
>coal.
>14. In the year 2000 it's a really stupid thing to be
>doing.
>
>Don't forget to put all of this into your own words,
>expand on the things you know about, put your name,
>address and signature, and send it in so it has arrived
>before 5pm, September 4.
>Then you can sleep well at night - for a while.
>For more information try www.nccnsw.org.au/forests or
>ring (02) 92792855


Birding-Aus is on the Web at
www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
to 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Gunnedah submissions needed now, David Stewart <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU