birding-aus

birding in the UK

To: "Jon and Fiona Hall" <>
Subject: birding in the UK
From: Tony Russell <>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 13:00:47 +0900

It's not just you Jon!! I too prefer things the way they are here - and
leave the crowded commercialism to the poms.
T.


At 05:43  6/07/00 +1000, you wrote:
>Maybe it is just me, but I don't think birding in the UK is quite as rosy a
>picture as some are painting.  Sure all the benefits you list are real, but
>there are a fair few cons too, which I think should be remembered.
>
>If you visit most UK bird watching hotspots at any time of the year you are
>pretty much guaranteed to be surrounded by scores of people all talking into
>pocket tape-recorders, jostling for position and swinging their scopes
>around.  If a rarity blows in then the scores of people turn into hundreds
>even thousands.  Partly this is just a function of the UK generally (too
>small and too crowded) and would probably never happen here.  But certainly
>one of the greatest joys for me of living here is to be able to watch
>wildlife in utter solitude, even near major cities.  So although I hope
>attitiudes to conservation change for the majority, I do think its rather
>nice being part of a minority.
>
>cheers
>
>Jon
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Waanders <>
>To: Birding Aus <>
>Date: 06 July 2000 11:13
>Subject: Re: [BIRDING-AUS] birding etc (was sensitive information)
>
>
>>Good Morning Birders
>>
>>I've been thinking about a message that was posted a few days ago, which I
>>have unfortunately deleted. The author related to the fact that birding in
>>the UK was "almost mainstream", very public, large scale, and quite
>>organised, as opposed to Oz birding being a niche activity pursued by only
>>few. In the UK and other European countries (Scandinavia, Holland) and also
>>the USA, birding/birdwatching has taken a huge flight :-) over the last
>>decade.
>>Wouldn't it be nice if the same situation could be achieved in Australia?
>>Imagine, you could buy Wingspan at the newsagency, there would be
>>birdwatching shows on commercial TV, newspapers would run bird related
>>stories, Birds Australia would have 10,000s members.
>>After all, with birding being a more commonly accepted and pursued
>activity,
>>the birds can only benefit. More public awareness, more money raised, more
>>people doing bird counts of various kinds, even more interest from pollies
>>(?!?) all leading to more & better research and conservation efforts.
>>The awareness and enthusiastic public uptake of birding in the above
>>mentioned countries has not always been so. Only in the late eighties/early
>>nineties things started to change and snowballed from then on. General
>>awareness of environmental issues started to increase. The Dutch
>association
>>for bird conservation & research was lucky enough to attract a publicly
>>known personality to its committee who started to push their case on TV a
>>fair bit. He started appearing in programs comparable to Better Homes &
>>Gardens and the like. At the same time, twitching became more popular and
>>the media started to become interested in all these "weirdos with
>>binoculars" travelling from far & wide to watch rarities. Subsequently to
>>these two processes, membership of associations for bird conservation &
>>research started to rise, prompting them to - with now increasing funds -
>>intensify public campaigns, advertising, and so on. Sponsorship was found
>>for TV ads and within a few years birding had become an "almost mainstream"
>>activity.
>>Could we learn something from these experiences? I think so. Birds
>Australia
>>has a unique opportunity to tap into a growing public awareness of
>>environmental issues. Just remember the outcry about landclearing; the
>>recent whaling debates; the "green thumbs" various landcare and natural
>>heritage trust schemes have created; etc etc.
>>I think BA have taken the first step and that was changing their name. They
>>now need to perhaps do a few case studies and apply overseas experiences to
>>the Australian situation, with the support and input from all of us. Only
>>then can birdwatching truly grow out of its current tiny niche.
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Peter Waanders
>>
>>website: www.riverland.net.au/~peterw
>>
>>The information in this e-mail may be confidential and/or legally
>>privileged.  Use or disclosure of the information by anyone other than the
>>intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received
>>this e-mail in error, please advise by return e-mail.
>>
>>
>>Birding-Aus is on the Web at
>>www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
>>"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
>>to 
>>
>>
>
>
>Birding-Aus is on the Web at
>www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
>"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
>to 
>



   ADELAIDE BIRDING with Tony Russell. South Australia by 4WD
   phone : 08 8337 5959  , o/s 61 8 8337 5959
   e-mail: 
   There's nothing quite like the feeling of seeing a new bird is there?

Birding-Aus is on the Web at
www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
to 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU