birding-aus

FW: Missing Number Eleven ?

To: "'Birding-aus'" <>
Subject: FW: Missing Number Eleven ?
From: "Osborn, Paul PR" <>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 11:25:08 +1000
> There are other imponderables associated with the RAOU numbers,.
> Numbers in the 900s are generally used for introduced birds (eg 999
> Common Starling, 998 Common Mynah) or rare (in Australia) vagrants;
> how then did the Striated Pardalote end up with 976?
> Paul Osborn
> Research Scientist
> BHP Research - Newcastle Labs
> PO Box 188 Wallsend, NSW, 2287
> Ph: (02) 49792705
> VPN: 8843 2705
> Fax: (02) 49792022
> 
> 
> ----------
> From:         Phil Joy[SMTP:
> Sent:         Thursday, 21 August 1997 11:51
> To:   
> Subject:      Missing Number Eleven ?
> 
> Cheers to all,
>               I recently copied a Birds of Australia species list for
> a friend
> who drew my attention to the fact that there was no RAOU map No 11
> included
> in the list.  On checking in Simpson & Day I found that their number
> eleven
> is in fact the Common Pheasant and the RAOU number for this species is
> 950.
> After checking through the data base and S&D it became apparent that
> some
> numbers have not been allotted RAOU maps and although they are in the
> main
> numerically consecutive, there are several numbers which have no maps
> allocated to them.
> Is there a reason for this, or is it just one of those things?
> 
> Phil Joy         
> P O Box 21
> Broome
> W A            6725
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU