birding-aus
|
Subject: | Re: Incipient species |
---|---|
From: | Russell Woodford <> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Jun 1995 12:42:58 +1000 (EST) |
i.campbell> I had a look at the Sibley & Monroe's incipient species list. i.campbell> Are these any different from sub-species or races? How do i.campbell> we treat this list? > INCIPIENT is the adjective from 'inception', and refers to something in the 'early stages' of a process. My understanding of this term is that it is used to describe groups within a species (call them races or subspecies or whatever) that are early along the way to becoming distinct species, or at the beginning of their long trek of speciation. What I find strange about this is that these distinctions are made by humans, not necessarily by the birds, so it is all rather arbitrary. But I suppose the term means that the birds are changing, becoming different, rather than that we are changing the ground-rules for specific status. I'm not a biologist, so please correct me if I'm wrong. Russell Woodford ================================================= |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Bristle-thighed Curlew, Red-rumped Swallow, Rafael Furniss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Incipient species, John Penhallurick |
Previous by Thread: | Bristle-thighed Curlew, Red-rumped Swallow, Rafael Furniss |
Next by Thread: | Re: Incipient species, John Penhallurick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU