Has anybody tried this? I'm thinking about using JFFS2 mainly because:
1) According to what I read on the YAFFS [1] site JFFS2 is more efficient in
small partitions. I'm essentially not writing to the flash so the YAFFS garbage
collection advantage is of no use.
2) Mainstream kernel 2.6 comes with JFFS2 support.
3) I'm gessing 2.4 and 2.6 can read the same JFFS2 partition (as one would
normally expect) contrary to what happens with YAFFS... but this is just a
guess... or a hunch if you will.
Gonzalo
[1] C. F. Johnson, Comparison between YAFFS (YAFFS2) and JFFS2,
http://www.yaffs.net/comparison-yaffs-vs-jffs
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|