ts-7000
[Top] [All Lists]

[ts-7000] Re: Thoughts on the new TS-7400 board

To:
Subject: [ts-7000] Re: Thoughts on the new TS-7400 board
From: "gebbet00" <>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:32:31 -0000
What probably Don means is 82C54-like functionality. And he's right,
that's what I miss most in this card ( besides the capability of using
TS-DIO64, of course ). Is it still possible to add such capability?


--- In  "Don W. Carr" <> wrote:
>
> Sorry I have not answered, I have been at a conference on
entrepreneurship
> in Mexico City.
> 
> The timers I would like are for counting edges on external signals
(watching
> DIO pin), which I think you referred to as frequency counters. I use
them in
> conjunction  with  the internal free running counters to calculate a
> frequency (speed) every second based on input from an encoder. The
internal
> free running counter tells me the exact time between counter
readings. We
> could get by with 2 external edge counters (no extra XDIO
functionality),
> and 4 total serial ports,(1 RS-485 and 3 RS-232), but would like to
keep the
> SD card to record history.
> 
> Well, for now, we will likely stick with the TS-7300 which has all
of this
> out of the box, since that is already a very good price compared to
other
> options, and space is not a huge deal, though smaller and more
rugged would
> be much better. I looked at the small extruded aluminum case with
room for
> signal conditioning, and that looked great.
> 
> At some point, I will make an RTU with the TS-7400 though. Having say 12
> DIO, 4 AI, 1 RS485, 2 RS232, 2 external edge counters, 2 Gig data
logging,
> etc, would make for a killer little basic RTU or just remote I/O
connected
> to a network. Of course would have built in serial server, mod-bus
bridge,
> etc. We might put it in a small extruded aluminum case with signal
> conditioning on a dauthter board and military style quick
connector(s) to
> connect to terminal strips or  directly to the  system if  wired with a
> compatible connector. I have all of the software for an RTU (GPL),
that is
> arround v0.1 quality and is currently being used to control an
instrument
> and record / analyze data. I will put it on source forge when I can
resolve
> the legal issues with the University.
> 
> Sorry I could not stop longer when I was in Phoenix, but we had to meet
> people for lunch and then depart for Guadalajara. We might be back
through
> this winter though and I could stop by. I will definitely be getting
a 7400
> for my personal use along with the extruded aluminum case. It would
be nice
> if you guys sold a daughter board that could be used for making up
> prototypes (or even end products for onsey twosey type things).
> 
> Well, if you can do it without a lot of work, let us know what
combination
> of uarts and external edge counters you could fit in the little core
> available, and still keep the SD option. We understand the board
just came
> out and you can not do everything at once.
> 
> Don.
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/10/06, Jesse Off < > wrote:
> >
> >    --- In  <ts-7000%40yahoogroups.com>, "Don W.
> > Carr" <doncarr@> wrote:
> > >
> > > For me, the best thing you could add is two high speed counters,
> > and extra
> > > serial ports. I have a project that needs 5 serial ports, 2 high
> > speed
> > > counters, and some DIO, and this little board would be perfect if
> > we could
> > > do that. By the way, we really like the way you count transitions
> > instead of
> > > cycles since that cuts the error for frequency calculations in
> > half! We
> > > would even be willing to pay for the mods.
> >
> > Could you elaborate on the high speed counters? Do you mean a free-
> > running register in memory space counting upwards or a frequency
> > counter watching a DIO pin?
> >
> > With a custom FPGA, we can strip down features you tell us you don't
> > need and make some more room for things you do. I'm not sure I can
> > fit 3 extra UARTs, SD card core, NAND controller core, boilerplate
> > glue logic and frequency counters all in a 570 LUT CPLD/FPGA, but if
> > you're willing to give up SD and boot to NAND flash it would be no
> > problem.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I like the XDIO, but I think it would be better if you could still
> > use the
> > > other DIO when the counters are used, and also you need a longer
> > register
> > > for the PWM high/low times so we can hit all frequencies +/-0.05%
> > duty
> > > cycle.
> >
> > By counters do you mean the little "trick" you can do to loopback PWM
> > to the pulse-counter for an arbitrary freq free-running counter?
> > This indeed will tie up the PWM pin and feature and the pulse timer
> > feature, but other GPIO's and features should still be useable.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > When will you have a case? We would like room for a signal
> > conditioning
> > > board in the case like you have with your other cases.
> >
> > This board is a standard size that fits into some very inexpensive
> > off-the-shelf extruded aluminum cases. We only have to do custom
> > metal and screening work on the endplates and they should be here
> > this week. I'm not sure theres room in the smallest case we're
> > supporting for a "daughterboard" with a mating 40 pin female
> > connector. What would work though would be to just solder your board
> > to the .1" headers directly. This would get you an extremely rugged
> > device with a very low stack height.
> >
> > We used the .1" headers partially for the reason that they would be
> > easy to solder a daughterboard directly to. We were thinking about
> > doing an edge connector like a SIMM socket or a high density hirose
> > style connector, but came to the conclusion that would just be
> > idiotic for targetting ruggedness. Edge connectors are mechanically
> > weak and unwieldy (there was a reason PC/104 went the way it did
> > rather than stay with the PC card-edge slots). Those high-density
> > connectors aren't much better and some were only rated for 50 mate
> > cycles! Granted they'd likely only be mated once, but that just
> > doesn't sound like a reliable connector to me, so instead we put
> > the .1" pin header on and tons of mounting holes.
> >
> > We really like these extruded aluminum enclosures. An advantage
> > besides being inexpensive is that they are extremely strong-- you
> > could probably run one of these things over with a truck without it
> > collapsing! We will definitely be testing that once they come in.
> >
> > P.S.
> > Our production workers say you stopped by our office a month or so
> > ago to pick up some boards-- wish you would have dropped by in Bob's
> > or my office before you left, as we would have liked to have met you!
> >
> > //Jesse Off
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Don W. Carr
> J. G. Montenegro 2258
> Guadalajara, Mexico
> +52-333-630-0704
> +52-333-836-4500 ext 2930
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
     
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ts-7000] Re: Thoughts on the new TS-7400 board, gebbet00 <=
Admin

Disclaimer: Neither Andrew Taylor nor the University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering take any responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU