Re: [pwc] Re: pwc Digest, Vol 7, Issue 1

[Hamed Ahmadi Nejad <>]

On 7/1/05, Micah Villmow <> wrote:
> To further optimize the division in this line:
>
> > >                 pout_planar_u = dst + n;
> > >                 pout_planar_v = dst + n + n / 4;
>
> wouldn't it be better to get rid of the division and use n >>  2 instead?

You don't need to worry about that; the compiler's optimizer does it
for you automatically.
_______________________________________________
pwc mailing list

http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc