naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ambisonic audio

Subject: Re: ambisonic audio
From: "Aaron Ximm" aaron_gmail
Date: Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:28 am ((PST))
Thanks Brian,

That Zoom is crazy-looking but promising - for $350 it's certainly got my
interest. I thought the capsules on the H2 were pretty decent and the UX
pretty decent as well, I'm a fan for the price point. The H2 was always a
backup for the Sony, but, if this is at least at that par, I will likely
give it a go.

The AA powering is a pleasant surprise for long term travel as well!

I do wonder about windscreening that thing though...

aaron

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:16 AM 'Brian Valente' 
[naturerecordists] <> wrote:

>
>
> Update on this
>
>
>
> Zoom is now shipping the H3 =96 a 360 microphone array that includes a
> recorder in Ambisonics A and B formats
>
>
> https://www.zoom-na.com/products/field-video-recording/field-recording/zo=
om-h3-vr-handy-recorder
>
>
>
>
>
> it looks promising, although I=92ve never been impressed with Zoom=92s ca=
psules
>
>
>
>
>
> on the headphones side, Audeze introduced the Mobius which is a
> headtracking 3D headphone.
>
>
> https://www.zoom-na.com/products/field-video-recording/field-recording/zo=
om-h3-vr-handy-recorder
>
>
>
> they are a bit pricey but well reviewed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> so=85 some new hardware that seems to advance the state-of-the-art
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> portfolio https://www.brianvalentephotography.com/
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Valente 
> *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2018 10:51 AM
> *To:* 
> *Subject:* RE: [Nature Recordists] ambisonic audio
>
>
>
> Hi Aaron
>
>
>
> Thanks for your thoughts.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regarding a =93next generation=94 type of setup, what do you think is mis=
sing.
> Is it in the mics/capture, or more in the post processing, or maybe both?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> portfolio https://www.brianvalentephotography.com/
>
>
>
> *From:*  [
>  <=
>]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2018 3:27 PM
> *To:* 
> *Subject:* Re: [Nature Recordists] ambisonic audio
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> I got excited at the prospect of taking an Ambisonics mic into the field
> to do the kind of 'anthropogenic'-centric soundscape recording I've done
> lots of using near-binaural mics (and some Blumlein and M/S and spaced
> omni).
>
> The tantalizing prospect was to take composed immersive sound to the next
> level, allowing and playing with, as you say, listener head
> position=96especially since platforms like YouTube and Facebook support
> headset decode and have some rudimentary HRTF synthesis...
>
> ...long story short, my enthusiasm cooled significantly when I played wit=
h
> live-decode from recordings made with second-generation tetrahedral
> ambisonics, because for people used to 'rich' stereo with a lot of subtle
> cues for e.g. depth and focused localization, the stereo image produced
> felt very vague and flat=96more like an uneven flat sphere than a three
> dimensional space, as it were.
>
> From what I understand higher-order Ambisonics fills in the 'holes' and
> gives more, but IMO what's going to be really necessary for the technique
> to work as I want is to somehow capture, and be able to "remove in post"
> the timing and maybe to some extent frequency variation characteristic of
> HRTF, and synthesize more accurately those differences for the
> realtime-rendered head position.
>
> I have vague ideas of how one might in theory attempt this, there should
> be enough information in a tetrahedral array=96and there should be ways o=
f
> e.g. using a nested double tetrahedral array at controlled spacing, maybe
> with the inner set serving as an occluding baffle...
>
> ...but that would require a lot of computation if it worked at all...
>
> ...and I'm too lazy personally to take it on. So far.
>
> But absent some kind of next-generation step up, I am myself waiting for
> more to be there before jumping... :/
>
> aaron
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:59 PM 'Brian Valente' 
> [naturerecordists] <> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Is anyone experimenting or working with ambisonic audio?
>
>
>
> I see new VR microphones out there, Zoom just released a 360 mic for
> around $350
>
>
>
> I=92ve always been a fan of and recorded ambient, but I really love the i=
dea
> of putting on headphones and as the you move your head, the audio moves
> accordingly so it=92s as though you were really there
>
>
>
>
>
> I just haven=92t seen much in the way of standalone ambisonic audio or
> headphones for that purposes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> portfolio https://www.brianvalentephotography.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>   
>   quietamerican.org <http://quietamerican..org>
>   oneminutevacation.org
>
>   83% happy
>    9% disgusted
>    6% fearful
>    2% angry
>
>
>
>
>


--
  
  quietamerican.org
  oneminutevacation.org

  83% happy
   9% disgusted
   6% fearful
   2% angry





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU