Subject: | Re: A test with Zoom H6 |
---|---|
From: | "Jim Mooney" jmooney776 |
Date: | Sun Mar 5, 2017 7:00 pm ((PST)) |
Really great! I=92ve been toying with the idea of trying the H5. I like t= he choice of microphone modules. I=92ve been experimenting with external m= icrophones and while the quality is good I find it=92s cumbersome to carry = and deal with them. Best, Jim > On Mar 3, 2017, at 5:19 PM, Arn=FE=F3r Helgason = s [naturerecordists] <> wrote: > > I have been testing Zoom H6 for a month. It seems to be a reasonable and= > handy recorder for various kinds of envorenmental recordings. > > Today I took it to the center of Reykjavik and made some recordings > close to the City hall. I used the attached stereomic (XY) set to 120=B0.= > A fur-windscreen from Rode was used. > > This recorder is a lot better than Olympus LS-11 but a lot more heavy > and here in Iceland it is also cheeper. > > http://hljod.blog.is/users/df/hljod/files/tjornin.mp3 > > Arnthor > > > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: A test with Zoom H6, brianinnes81 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: A test with Zoom H6, Arn=FE=F3r Helgason |
Previous by Thread: | Re: A test with Zoom H6, brianinnes81 |
Next by Thread: | Re: A test with Zoom H6, Arn=FE=F3r Helgason |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU