> Can anyone tell me how well a PCM-M10 would record bats with either the b=
uilt in mics or external EM-172 mics? I can set the recorder to the highest=
setting, 96kHz, which should be able to record half that frequency?
Hi Peter, I tried recording bats using the internal mics (which are a vara=
int of the EM-172) of the PCM-M10 a couple of years ago. It worked reasonab=
ly good for bat species calling at relatively low frequencies below about 3=
0 kHz.
Here is a recording of the common noctule (Nyctalus noctula) from Germany:
http://www.avisoft.com/soundscapes/100516_22.WAV http://www.avisoft.com/so=
undscapes/100516_22.WAV
http://www.avisoft.com/soundscapes/slowed%20down%20100516_22.WAV http://ww=
w.avisoft.com/soundscapes/slowed%20down%20100516_22.WAV
> Also, is there a recorder in the same price range that can record at 192k=
Hz
I'm not aware of such a recorder, except of the more expensive Tascam DR-6=
80 MkII and Tascam DR-701D.
You might perhaps instead use an USB audio interface such as the Roland Qu=
adCapture (http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.php?ProductId=3D=
1166), which works fine at 192 kHz.
Regards,
Raimund
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|