There are 11 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1a. Remote recording devices/traps
From: bwanakomba
1b. Re: Remote recording devices/traps
From: Tom Williams
2a. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
From: Bernie Krause
2b. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
From: Gianni Pavan
2c. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
From: Bernie Krause
2d. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
From: Gianni Pavan
2e. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
From: Bernie Krause
2f. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
From: Peter Shute
2g. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
From: D Secomb
3a. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded. (More)
From: Bernie Krause
4a. Re: Bats
From: { brad brace }
Messages
________________________________________________________________________
1a. Remote recording devices/traps
Posted by: bwanakomba
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:41 am ((PST))
Hi,
I was wondering if the group has experience with remote sound recorders
analogous to camera traps that you can leave for about one month. I would want
to record nocturnal owls, bats, hyrax, bushbabies here in East Africa. Either
one that can be triggered by sound or programmed to record a sound window of
say 2 hours per day to limit battery time. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Regards Andrew
Messages in this topic (2)
________________________________________________________________________
1b. Re: Remote recording devices/traps
Posted by: "Tom Williams" pterodax
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 6:01 am ((PST))
Hi Andrew,
Ultrasonic versions of what you describe are used extensively for bat
research and monitoring and there are ones designed for use in the audible
frequency range as well. The Wildlife Acoustics Song Meter range should be
suitable for the kind of work you want to do:
http://www.wildlifeacoustics.com/
They're pretty expensive though - hopefully someone else on the group may
know of a cheaper option!
All the best,
Tom
On 19 February 2016 at 13:41, [naturerecordists] <
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I was wondering if the group has experience with remote sound recorders
> analogous to camera traps that you can leave for about one month. I would
> want to record nocturnal owls, bats, hyrax, bushbabies here in East
> Africa. Either one that can be triggered by sound or programmed to record
> a sound window of say 2 hours per day to limit battery time. Does anyone
> have any recommendations?
>
>
> Regards Andrew
>
>
>
>
Messages in this topic (2)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
2a. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
Posted by: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 6:15 am ((PST))
Yes. Bracket and copy the bat sequence. Then go to the drop-down menu File,
select New, and paste the sequence. With the sequence still bracketed, go to
drop-down menu Effects, select Time and Pitch, then choose Stretch and Pitch
(process). Uncheck the box Lock Stretch and Pitch Shift. Set Pitch Shift to -20
(semitones) and you should have bats within comfortable hearing range. Good
luck.
Bernie Krause
Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
TED Global talk:
http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.htm
On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:28 PM, D Secomb [naturerecordists]
<> wrote:
> Hi All
> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
> range of that file.
> Cheers
> David
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
> Posted by: D Secomb <>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
2b. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
Posted by: "Gianni Pavan" gpavan1960
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:18 am ((PST))
Hi, I think the best option to "hear" the structure of bat calls is to use
the function "adjust sample rate" to lower the playback sample rate. This
reduces the frequency range of the recording and expand the time
accordingly, thus allowing to perceive the thin structures of calls. If you
need to maintain the same duration the best option is to perform an FFT
shift of the frequencies, but it seems Audition is unable to do this.
Apparently it should be possible to catch a frequency region (by a
rectangular expanding box or by using the lazo) and copy it elsewhere, e.g.
at a lower frequency position, but it does not work. Someone has a solution
?
Gianni
2016-02-19 6:28 GMT+01:00 D Secomb [naturerecordists]
<>:
>
>
> Hi All
> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
> range of that file.
> Cheers
> David
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
>
>
>
--
Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
http://www.unipv.it/cibra
http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
2c. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
Posted by: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:32 am ((PST))
Lowering the frequency while maintaining the time scale is a really great
feature of Audition as I described earlier. We do that all the time (�cause,
unfortunately, I�ve lost the top octave of my hearing range, now). No kidding,
it�s pretty amazing. If you need help, I am happy to personally walk you
through the process on Skype. Takes about 2 minutes, total.
Bernie Krause
On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Gianni Pavan
[naturerecordists] <> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, I think the best option to "hear" the structure of bat calls is to use
> the function "adjust sample rate" to lower the playback sample rate. This
> reduces the frequency range of the recording and expand the time accordingly,
> thus allowing to perceive the thin structures of calls. If you need to
> maintain the same duration the best option is to perform an FFT shift of the
> frequencies, but it seems Audition is unable to do this. Apparently it should
> be possible to catch a frequency region (by a rectangular expanding box or by
> using the lazo) and copy it elsewhere, e.g. at a lower frequency position,
> but it does not work. Someone has a solution ?
>
> Gianni
>
> 2016-02-19 6:28 GMT+01:00 D Secomb
> [naturerecordists]<>:
>
> Hi All
> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
> range of that file.
> Cheers
> David
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
> Universit� degli Studi di Pavia
> Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
> http://www.unipv.it/cibra
> http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it
>
>
>
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
2d. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
Posted by: "Gianni Pavan" gpavan1960
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:35 pm ((PST))
Hi Bernie,
yes, your method works pretty well, however my preference is for a time
expansion to better perceive time details.
As for the direct downshift of high frequency sounds, in our recording
software it is possible to record ultrasounds and to hear them downshifted
by fft in real-time. With the cpu power now available even on tablets, the
software performs in real time the methods described more than 15 ago for
file analysis.
Gianni
2016-02-19 18:32 GMT+01:00 Bernie Krause
[naturerecordists] <>:
>
>
> Lowering the frequency while maintaining the time scale is a really great
> feature of Audition as I described earlier. We do that all the time
> (‘cause, unfortunately, I’ve lost the top octave of my hearing range, now).
> No kidding, it’s pretty amazing. If you need help, I am happy to personally
> walk you through the process on Skype. Takes about 2 minutes, total.
>
> Bernie Krause
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Gianni Pavan
> [naturerecordists] <> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi, I think the best option to "hear" the structure of bat calls is to use
> the function "adjust sample rate" to lower the playback sample rate. This
> reduces the frequency range of the recording and expand the time
> accordingly, thus allowing to perceive the thin structures of calls. If you
> need to maintain the same duration the best option is to perform an FFT
> shift of the frequencies, but it seems Audition is unable to do this.
> Apparently it should be possible to catch a frequency region (by a
> rectangular expanding box or by using the lazo) and copy it elsewhere, e.g.
> at a lower frequency position, but it does not work. Someone has a solution
> ?
>
> Gianni
>
> 2016-02-19 6:28 GMT+01:00 D Secomb
> [naturerecordists]<>:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi All
>> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
>> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
>> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
>> range of that file.
>> Cheers
>> David
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
> Università degli Studi di Pavia
> Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
> http://www.unipv.it/cibra
> http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it
>
>
>
>
>
--
Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
http://www.unipv.it/cibra
http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
2e. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
Posted by: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:10 pm ((PST))
I agree, Gianni. I was just confirming the possibilities with commonly
available software. It should be noted that one can also time-shift the
signals, as well, with Audition. Just leave the LOCK STRETCH AND PITCH SHIFT
box checked. As you say, it�s not possible in real time, though. However, Lang
Elliott, because of hearing problems, has designed and built a system that will
accomplish what you describe, though. It�s called the SongFinder and can be
looked at, here: http://hearbirdsagain.com If things keep regressing for me as
they have, hearing-wise, I�ll be needing one of those soon enough.
Bernie
Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
TED Global talk:
http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.htm
On Feb 19, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Gianni Pavan
[naturerecordists] <> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Bernie,
> yes, your method works pretty well, however my preference is for a time
> expansion to better perceive time details.
>
> As for the direct downshift of high frequency sounds, in our recording
> software it is possible to record ultrasounds and to hear them downshifted by
> fft in real-time. With the cpu power now available even on tablets, the
> software performs in real time the methods described more than 15 ago for
> file analysis.
>
> Gianni
>
> 2016-02-19 18:32 GMT+01:00 Bernie Krause
> [naturerecordists]<>:
>
>
> Lowering the frequency while maintaining the time scale is a really great
> feature of Audition as I described earlier. We do that all the time (�cause,
> unfortunately, I�ve lost the top octave of my hearing range, now). No
> kidding, it�s pretty amazing. If you need help, I am happy to personally walk
> you through the process on Skype. Takes about 2 minutes, total.
>
> Bernie Krause
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Gianni Pavan
> [naturerecordists] <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi, I think the best option to "hear" the structure of bat calls is to use
>> the function "adjust sample rate" to lower the playback sample rate. This
>> reduces the frequency range of the recording and expand the time
>> accordingly, thus allowing to perceive the thin structures of calls. If you
>> need to maintain the same duration the best option is to perform an FFT
>> shift of the frequencies, but it seems Audition is unable to do this.
>> Apparently it should be possible to catch a frequency region (by a
>> rectangular expanding box or by using the lazo) and copy it elsewhere, e.g.
>> at a lower frequency position, but it does not work. Someone has a solution ?
>>
>> Gianni
>>
>> 2016-02-19 6:28 GMT+01:00 D Secomb
>> [naturerecordists]<>:
>>
>> Hi All
>> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
>> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
>> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
>> range of that file.
>> Cheers
>> David
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
>> Universit� degli Studi di Pavia
>> Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
>> http://www.unipv.it/cibra
>> http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
> Universit� degli Studi di Pavia
> Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
> http://www.unipv.it/cibra
> http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it
>
>
>
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
2f. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
Posted by: "Peter Shute" pshute2
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:40 pm ((PST))
If something like a Songfinder is an acceptable solution, there are far cheaper
bat detectors available. I bought a "Discovery Kids Ultrasonic Detector" on
eBay for about $40. It's a heterodyne detector, and is of course a toy compared
to some, but it seems to work ok. I suspect though, that a software solution
would be better.
Peter Shute
Sent from my iPad
On 20 Feb 2016, at 9:10 AM, Bernie Krause
<> [naturerecordists]
<<>>
wrote:
I agree, Gianni. I was just confirming the possibilities with commonly
available software. It should be noted that one can also time-shift the
signals, as well, with Audition. Just leave the LOCK STRETCH AND PITCH SHIFT
box checked. As you say, it’s not possible in real time, though. However, Lang
Elliott, because of hearing problems, has designed and built a system that will
accomplish what you describe, though. It’s called the SongFinder and can be
looked at, here: http://hearbirdsagain.com If things keep regressing for me as
they have, hearing-wise, I’ll be needing one of those soon enough.
Bernie
Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
<>
SKYPE: biophony
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
TED Global talk:
http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.htm
On Feb 19, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Gianni Pavan
<> [naturerecordists]
<<>>
wrote:
Hi Bernie,
yes, your method works pretty well, however my preference is for a time
expansion to better perceive time details.
As for the direct downshift of high frequency sounds, in our recording software
it is possible to record ultrasounds and to hear them downshifted by fft in
real-time. With the cpu power now available even on tablets, the software
performs in real time the methods described more than 15 ago for file analysis.
Gianni
2016-02-19 18:32 GMT+01:00 Bernie Krause
<>
[naturerecordists]<<>>:
Lowering the frequency while maintaining the time scale is a really great
feature of Audition as I described earlier. We do that all the time (‘cause,
unfortunately, I’ve lost the top octave of my hearing range, now). No kidding,
it’s pretty amazing. If you need help, I am happy to personally walk you
through the process on Skype. Takes about 2 minutes, total.
Bernie Krause
On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Gianni Pavan
<> [naturerecordists]
<<>>
wrote:
Hi, I think the best option to "hear" the structure of bat calls is to use the
function "adjust sample rate" to lower the playback sample rate. This reduces
the frequency range of the recording and expand the time accordingly, thus
allowing to perceive the thin structures of calls. If you need to maintain the
same duration the best option is to perform an FFT shift of the frequencies,
but it seems Audition is unable to do this. Apparently it should be possible to
catch a frequency region (by a rectangular expanding box or by using the lazo)
and copy it elsewhere, e.g. at a lower frequency position, but it does not
work. Someone has a solution ?
Gianni
2016-02-19 6:28 GMT+01:00 D Secomb
<>
[naturerecordists]<<>>:
Hi All
I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
range of that file.
Cheers
David
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/>
Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
--
Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
http://www.unipv.it/cibra
http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it<http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it/>
--
Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
http://www.unipv.it/cibra
http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it<http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it/>
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
2g. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded.
Posted by: "D Secomb" dsecomb2
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 11:02 pm ((PST))
Thank you Bernie and Gianni
Gianni suggestion would be so simple but your are right, it doesn't work
in auditions, in my versions any way.
Bernie, you got me in the right direction. I suspect our versions were
different as the last step wasn't there. After a bit of playing around,
I got the results I was looking for.
The exercise was, early one morning I recorded some bats which were
coming close. The echo was recorded which of course, I couldn't hear
plus their wings/ feeding noises. The aim was to bring the echo part
down to hearing range and blend with wing/ feeding noises. The result
wasn't perfect but at least I'm on the right track.
Cheers
David
On 20/02/2016 6:10 AM, Bernie Krause
[naturerecordists] wrote:
>
> I agree, Gianni. I was just confirming the possibilities with commonly
> available software. It should be noted that one can also time-shift
> the signals, as well, with Audition. Just leave the LOCK STRETCH AND
> PITCH SHIFT box checked. As you say, it�s not possible in real time,
> though. However, Lang Elliott, because of hearing problems, has
> designed and built a system that will accomplish what you describe,
> though. It�s called the SongFinder and can be looked at, here:
> http://hearbirdsagain.com If things keep regressing for me as they
> have, hearing-wise, I�ll be needing one of those soon enough.
>
>
> Bernie
> Wild Sanctuary
> POB 536
> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> 707-996-6677
> http://www.wildsanctuary.com
>
> SKYPE: biophony
> FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
> TED Global
> talk:
> http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.htm
>
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Gianni Pavan
> <> [naturerecordists]
> <
> <>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Bernie,
>> yes, your method works pretty well, however my preference is for
>> a time expansion to better perceive time details.
>>
>> As for the direct downshift of high frequency sounds, in our
>> recording software it is possible to record ultrasounds and to hear
>> them downshifted by fft in real-time. With the cpu power now
>> available even on tablets, the software performs in real time the
>> methods described more than 15 ago for file analysis.
>>
>> Gianni
>>
>> 2016-02-19 18:32 GMT+01:00 Bernie
>> <>[naturerecordists]<
>>
>> <>>:
>>
>>
>> Lowering the frequency while maintaining the time scale is a
>> really great feature of Audition as I described earlier. We do
>> that all the time (�cause, unfortunately, I�ve lost the top
>> octave of my hearing range, now). No kidding, it�s pretty
>> amazing. If you need help, I am happy to personally walk you
>> through the process on Skype. Takes about 2 minutes, total.
>>
>> Bernie Krause
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Gianni
>> <>[naturerecordists]
>> <
>> <>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi, I think the best option to "hear" the structure of bat calls
>>> is to use the function "adjust sample rate" to lower the
>>> playback sample rate. This reduces the frequency range of the
>>> recording and expand the time accordingly, thus allowing to
>>> perceive the thin structures of calls. If you need to maintain
>>> the same duration the best option is to perform an FFT shift of
>>> the frequencies, but it seems Audition is unable to do this.
>>> Apparently it should be possible to catch a frequency region (by
>>> a rectangular expanding box or by using the lazo) and copy it
>>> elsewhere, e.g. at a lower frequency position, but it does not
>>> work. Someone has a solution ?
>>>
>>> Gianni
>>>
>>> 2016-02-19 6:28 GMT+01:00 D
>>>
>>> <>[naturerecordists]<
>>> <>>:
>>>
>>> Hi All
>>> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing
>>> them. Using
>>> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
>>> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the
>>> whole frequency
>>> range of that file.
>>> Cheers
>>> David
>>>
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG -www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
>>> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release
>>> Date: 02/18/16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
>>> Universit� degli Studi di Pavia
>>> Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
>>> http://www.unipv.it/cibra
>>> http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it <http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it/>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali
>> Universit� degli Studi di Pavia
>> Via Taramelli 24, 27100 Pavia
>> http://www.unipv.it/cibra
>> http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it <http://mammiferimarini.unipv.it/>
>>
>>
>
>
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11662 - Release Date: 02/19/16
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
3a. Re: Hearing Bats that been recorded. (More)
Posted by: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 6:43 am ((PST))
I forgot to add that you first need to see the bat vox in spectrogram mode in
order to bracket it.
BK
********************************************
Yes. Bracket and copy the bat sequence. Then go to the drop-down menu File,
select New, and paste the sequence. With the sequence still bracketed, go to
drop-down menu Effects, select Time and Pitch, then choose Stretch and Pitch
(process). Uncheck the box Lock Stretch and Pitch Shift. Set Pitch Shift to -20
(semitones) and you should have bats within comfortable hearing range. Good
luck.
Bernie Krause
Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
TED Global talk:
http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.htm
On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:28 PM, D Secomb [naturerecordists]
<> wrote:
> Hi All
> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
> range of that file.
> Cheers
> David
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
> Posted by: D Secomb <>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Messages in this topic (9)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
4a. Re: Bats
Posted by: "{ brad brace }" bbrace2001
Date: Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:14 pm ((PST))
I'd say they're more of an intense bone-marrow sound ;) For
me maybe the most impressive exposures on remote Fiji
islands were the bats during sunset: hundreds that would
dive/swoop/respond to your mimicked squeeks while on their
way home!
On an island, a place of edges, the ocean provides a counter-narrative,
nonlinear in
what it reveals; "time's arrow" is modified by the rhythmic cycle of the sea as
it
encounters, and ever transforms, the shore. Historical, archaeological, or even
narrative knowledge is challenged by its meeting with the sea that offers up
its own
kind of knowing. We need to stretch, even confound, our usual frames to take
account
of such knowledge.
special daily yasawa islands mp4s (small short films)
now available for free download
http://www.eskimo.com/~bbrace/undisclosed.html
http://archive.org/details/globalislandsproject
(remote Fiji WAYA/YASAWAS islands:)
Island 8.0 is now available online!
====================================
http://bbrace.net/islands/island8/island8.html
http://bradbrace.net/islands/island8/island8.html
Global Islands Project -- ongoing series of multi-media
pdf-ebooks/field-recordings -- a
pastoral, pictorial and phonic elicitation of island parameters. An intensive
examination of small islands and their paradigmatic solutions to globalism...
Ethnographically a shared world of historical experience -- not the
romanticized and
divided universe of them and us.
Your feudal-world is based on mutual relief at your common corruption. Maybe
some
cultures are based on even worse. But that wouldn't change the bad faith of it
and as
years go by, you wake at night in terror of your whole life being an act of
shattered
faith, where everything is self-interest and nothing more, where every human
interaction is driven by a silent, even subconscious calculation of some
ulterior
motive, to the point that a sea of bad faith has taken over your whole life,
there's no
small island left from which you can even try to build a bridge of good faith,
because
even that effort becomes suspect, even good faith is nothing but
self-interested, even
altruism is nothing but solipsistic, even your professed agonizing right here
right now
is nothing but a gesture, made to the conscience in order to assure it that it
exists.
Deglobalisation is not a synonym for withdrawing from the world economy. It
means a
process of restructuring the world economic and political system so that the
latter
builds the capacity of local and national economies instead of degrading it.
Deglobalisation means the transformation of a global economy from one integrated
around the needs of transnational corporations to one integrated around the
needs of
peoples, nations, and communities. We cannot talk about construction without
deconstruction, reintegration without disintegration.
The world (universe) is mostly filled with the black hole (or the vast and deep
sea )
of the forgotten. Compared with this, the world of memory is only a small
island in
the vast "sea of oblivion."
http://bradbrace.net/id.html
http://bbrace.net/id.html
Island 1.0 is Ambergris Caye, Belize
Island 2.0 is Koh Si Chang, Thailand
Island 3.0 is Lamu, Kenya
Island 4.0 is Narikel Jingira, Bangladesh
Island 5.0 is Isla Mais, Nicaragua
Island 6.0 are The Grenadines, West Indies
Island 7.0 is Hateruma (Yaeyama), Japan
Island 8.0 is Waya (Yasawa), Fiji
Global Islands Project:
Island 8.0 -> http://bbrace.net/islands/island8/island8.html
or http://bradbrace.net/islands/island8/island8.html
-- over 1500 images and hour-long audiotrack -- 750mb -- (acrobat 6)
***
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_1.0
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_2.0
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_3.0
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_4.0
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_5.0
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_6.0
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_7.0
http://www.archive.org/details/global_islands_project_island_8.0
***
Global Islands Project -- ongoing series of multi-media pdf-books -- a
pastoral, pictorial and phonic elicitation of island parameters...
A traveller, who has lost their way, should not ask, 'Where am I?' What s/he
really wants to know is, 'Where are the other places?'
Ni sa yali ga na noda itovo, sa oti sara ga o keda.
(When we lose our culture, we are nothing.)
Vientos del pueblo me llevan
Vientos del pueblo me arrastran
Me eparcen mi corazon
Ye me aventan la garganta
http://www.bbrace.net/id.html
http://bradbrace.net/id.html
bbs: brad brace sound
http://69.64.229.114:8000
http://www.bbrace.net/undisclosed.html
Waters Colours:
http://bradbrace.net/webgallerywc/wc.html
Eroticized Japanese/Malaysian Snack Foods:
http://bradbrace.net/greenscreen.html
Additional GIP texts/blog:
http://bbrace.net/wordpress/
http://bradbrace.net/wordpress/
12 mailing list:
You cannot politically defy the institutions when all you really wanted
was to be clasped to their bosoms and hope in time to be cherished under
the very framework of oppressive values you are thinking of overcoming.
That would be co-optation, revolution only in the sense of a circulation
of elites rather than the extirpation of the very impulses of elitism.
To subscribe to 12-list, simply send a message with the word "subscribe"
in the Subject: field to
/:b
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 wrote:
> There is 1 message in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. Hearing Bats that been recorded.
> From: D Secomb
>
>
> Message
> ________________________________________________________________________
> 1. Hearing Bats that been recorded.
> Posted by: "D Secomb" dsecomb2
> Date: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:28 pm ((PST))
>
> Hi All
> I have recorded same bats which I have no chance of hearing them. Using
> Adobe Audition 1.4 or 3, is there any way of bring just the bat
> frequency down so I can hear it without compressing the whole frequency
> range of that file.
> Cheers
> David
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7442 / Virus Database: 4533/11654 - Release Date: 02/18/16
Messages in this topic (2)
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|