naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

[Nature Recordists] Digest Number 6457

To: "" <>
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Digest Number 6457
From: "" <>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:06:34 +0000
There are 7 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1a. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788    
    From:  madl74
1b. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788    
    From: Gregory O&#39;Drobinak
1c. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788    
    From: emil klotzsch
1d. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788    
    From: Jonas Gruska

2. Recordings from Botswana    
    From: Daan Hendriks

3. field laptop for hydrophone recordings?    
    From: Jodi Gronborg

4. SQN 5s    
    From: emil klotzsch


Messages
________________________________________________________________________
1a. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788
    Posted by:   madl74
    Date: Tue Aug 25, 2015 8:25 am ((PDT))

> David:
> How does one calculate the 'thermal noise' of air?  --> I assume that it is a 
> function of temperature, but does the diaphragm of the mic have anything to 
> do with it?

Gregory, 

The equations can be seen in;
http://www.bksv.com/doc/technicalreview1972-3.pdf
but I prefer to think about tiny ping pong balls rattling around at random. 
they only stop at absolute zero K or about -273 C. 

The noise level they make when rattling against a mic diaphragm goes up with 
temperature and frequency, the latter at 3dB per octave, so we need to 
choose a frequency band, hence the standard A-weighting and also state a
0 phon starting point which is taken at 1 KHz. 

The Phon is defined as an RMS pressure of 20 microPascals. This is an 
arbitrary level and most people can't hear it at 1KHz. However, as the 
thermal noise rises at 3 dB per octave, keen ears can just heat a faint 
hiss. I reckon I have heard it once while in my teens in an extremely quiet 
place after resting for about an hour. My breathing was thunderous, my heart 
thumping noisily and once my stomach and ear ringing settled down I heard a 
faint high pitched hiss. 

Wiki is not very helpful but SPL is discussed on:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_pressure#Sound_pressure_level
If you scroll down, it gives a table of sound levels. 

> Then how does this thermal noise calculation translate into an equivalent 
> measure of dBA or EIN for a given mic?

Excess noise in mics is theoretically the difference between the total 
output noise compared with the expected incoming thermal noise of the air. 

With a diaphragm mic with an incoming wanted sound from the front, air 
thermal noise is incoming on both faces of the diaphragm, giving a 
theoretical limiting noise figure of +3 dB. However, this type of instrument 
mic wouldn't stand up to everyday use, and the hardy MKH series of mics 
compromise at around 10 dB excess noise (weighted and above 0 Phon)which is 
about as good as it gets with any field mic. 

Once you push up the gain in a quiet location, as I explained before, you 
can hear, or see on a spectrogram, high frequency air thermal noise. This is 
because you ears don't follow the Fletcher-Munson curves which no longer 
apply;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fletcher%E2%80%93Munson_curves 

David Brinicombe 







Messages in this topic (12)
________________________________________________________________________
1b. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788
    Posted by: "Gregory O&#39;Drobinak"  gmo_dunes2
    Date: Tue Aug 25, 2015 1:03 pm ((PDT))

David:
Thanks for the references, below!
As for the exact calculation of the thermal noise in air, I found a reference 
here:http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/23/6/10.1121/1.1906831
The only issue with it is that I can't find a free copy of it (the ASA article 
cost is $30.00, the cost of a whole book!), so I will try to get a copy from a 
library.
However, the whole issue of microphone capsule self noise seems to be a bit 
more complicated than you make it out to be, below, and is not limited by a '0 
dB SPL barrier'.
The B&K Type 4179 capsule has an inherent noise floor of -5.5 dBA, which is 
less than what you quote as a theoretical value for self noise. Note that the 
microphone system, comprising the capsule and preamp, has an inherent noise 
floor of -2.5 dBA which is due to the compensation filter in the Type 2260 
preamp. The data sheet is here:http://www.bksv.com/doc/bp0389.pdf
The description of that mic capsule points out that the dominant self noise 
source is generated by the resistance of the mic capsule's damping system. This 
resistance is frequency dependent and generally rises to a frequency peak, then 
falls off, an aspect that was explored in the reference you provided from B&K 
(good paper!). 

Assuming the microphone manufacturers make good, low noise internal preamps, 
the final self noise of the system is mainly determined by the construction of 
the mic capsule itself. So it appears that the thermal noise of air is not 
really the issue. Rather, it is the electrical noise produced by the thermal 
effects of the capsule's damping resistance and that of of pressure 
equalization vent resistance. 

This really explains why it is hard to make a low noise mic that also has good 
frequency response, which is related to damping. Note also that if the thermal 
noise of air was perceivable, then it would have been impossible for B&K to 
make a 4179 capsule, since the acoustic pressure impinging on the diaphragm 
would exceed the measured self noise of -5.5 dBA.

As for A-weighting, I heartily agree that it is not suitable for specifying mic 
self noise, especially at low levels.ITU R-468 is a much better way to spec mic 
self noise. However, this is once again just a general sign post for 
measurement. 

Everyone's ears are different, not everyone hears the same way. Probably most 
of us have not had the remarkable experience that you describe regarding the 
'thermal noise'. So the best solution is to try a mic out and give a good 
listening.
Given all of this information, I propose that we forget about the thermal noise 
of air since it confuses the issue of microphone self noise and let's 
concentrate on how the manufacturer designed the capsule system. There are good 
mics with low self noise such as the Sennheiser MKH series, the Audio Technica 
AT4022 and the Rode NT1A.

All the best,Greg

     From: " [naturerecordists]" 
<>
 To:  
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:50 AM
 Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788
   
    > David:
> How does one calculate the 'thermal noise' of air? --> I assume that it is a 
> function of temperature, but does the diaphragm of the mic have anything to 
> do with it?

Gregory, 

The equations can be seen in;
http://www.bksv.com/doc/technicalreview1972-3.pdf
but I prefer to think about tiny ping pong balls rattling around at random. 
they only stop at absolute zero K or about -273 C. 

The noise level they make when rattling against a mic diaphragm goes up with 
temperature and frequency, the latter at 3dB per octave, so we need to 
choose a frequency band, hence the standard A-weighting and also state a
0 phon starting point which is taken at 1 KHz. 

The Phon is defined as an RMS pressure of 20 microPascals. This is an 
arbitrary level and most people can't hear it at 1KHz. However, as the 
thermal noise rises at 3 dB per octave, keen ears can just heat a faint 
hiss. I reckon I have heard it once while in my teens in an extremely quiet 
place after resting for about an hour. My breathing was thunderous, my heart 
thumping noisily and once my stomach and ear ringing settled down I heard a 
faint high pitched hiss. 

Wiki is not very helpful but SPL is discussed on:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_pressure#Sound_pressure_level
If you scroll down, it gives a table of sound levels. 

> Then how does this thermal noise calculation translate into an equivalent 
> measure of dBA or EIN for a given mic?

Excess noise in mics is theoretically the difference between the total 
output noise compared with the expected incoming thermal noise of the air. 

With a diaphragm mic with an incoming wanted sound from the front, air 
thermal noise is incoming on both faces of the diaphragm, giving a 
theoretical limiting noise figure of +3 dB. However, this type of instrument 
mic wouldn't stand up to everyday use, and the hardy MKH series of mics 
compromise at around 10 dB excess noise (weighted and above 0 Phon)which is 
about as good as it gets with any field mic. 

Once you push up the gain in a quiet location, as I explained before, you 
can hear, or see on a spectrogram, high frequency air thermal noise. This is 
because you ears don't follow the Fletcher-Munson curves which no longer 
apply;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fletcher%E2%80%93Munson_curves 

David Brinicombe 

  #yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455 -- #yiv7932732455ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-mkp #yiv7932732455hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-mkp #yiv7932732455ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-mkp .yiv7932732455ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-mkp .yiv7932732455ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-mkp .yiv7932732455ad a 
{color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-sponsor #yiv7932732455ygrp-lc #yiv7932732455hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-sponsor #yiv7932732455ygrp-lc .yiv7932732455ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv7932732455
 #yiv7932732455activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455activity span 
.yiv7932732455underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7932732455 
.yiv7932732455attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv7932732455 .yiv7932732455attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 .yiv7932732455attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7932732455 .yiv7932732455attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv7932732455 .yiv7932732455attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv7932732455 .yiv7932732455bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv7932732455 
.yiv7932732455bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 dd.yiv7932732455last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7932732455 dd.yiv7932732455last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7932732455 
dd.yiv7932732455last p span.yiv7932732455yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv7932732455 div.yiv7932732455attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 div.yiv7932732455attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv7932732455 div.yiv7932732455file-title a, #yiv7932732455 
div.yiv7932732455file-title a:active, #yiv7932732455 
div.yiv7932732455file-title a:hover, #yiv7932732455 div.yiv7932732455file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 div.yiv7932732455photo-title a, 
#yiv7932732455 div.yiv7932732455photo-title a:active, #yiv7932732455 
div.yiv7932732455photo-title a:hover, #yiv7932732455 
div.yiv7932732455photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 
div#yiv7932732455ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7932732455ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv7932732455yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv7932732455 
.yiv7932732455green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv7932732455 .yiv7932732455MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv7932732455 o {font-size:0;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455photos div div {border:1px solid 
#666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455photos div label 
{color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv7932732455
 #yiv7932732455reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv7932732455 .yiv7932732455replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv7932732455 input, #yiv7932732455 textarea 
{font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv7932732455 code {font:115% 
monospace;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-mlmsg * 
{line-height:1.22em;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7932732455logo 
{padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-msg p a 
{font-family:Verdana;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-msg 
p#yiv7932732455attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-reco #yiv7932732455reco-head 
{color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-reco 
{margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv7932732455ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-sponsor #yiv7932732455ov li 
{font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-sponsor #yiv7932732455ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 
8px;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-text 
{font-family:Georgia;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 
0;}#yiv7932732455 #yiv7932732455ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv7932732455 
#yiv7932732455ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none 
!important;}#yiv7932732455 

  



Messages in this topic (12)
________________________________________________________________________
1c. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788
    Posted by: "emil klotzsch"  onomatopoetik
    Date: Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:32 am ((PDT))

guys,
thanks a lot for all the answers!
thats great in this group, ask something, and learn something. very nice, 
thanks!

your experiences with the 788 are more what i thought they should be:-) 
sound devices answer was somewhat.. strange. they refused to answer how the 
measured the EIN for the 788, by the way. 

well, i will test a 788 against a 702 and a SQN5s in the future..

(by the way, i tested a zaxcom nomad against a 702. if anyone is interested in 
the results, i can post them..)




Messages in this topic (12)
________________________________________________________________________
1d. Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788
    Posted by: "Jonas Gruska"  mrqwa
    Date: Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:37 am ((PDT))

I would be interested in hearing your Zaxcom vs SD results.
BTW is measuring EIN as simple as plugging 1k ohm resistor to the XLR 
pin (pin 2 and 3?) and setting the gain to maximum?
I can do that with my 702 if needed.

Regards,
Jonas

✺ ✺ ✺
http://jonasgru.sk
On 26 Aug 2015, at 9:32, emil klotzsch  [naturerecordists] 
wrote:

> guys,
> thanks a lot for all the answers!
> thats great in this group, ask something, and learn something. very 
> nice, thanks!
>
> your experiences with the 788 are more what i thought they should 
> be:-)
> sound devices answer was somewhat.. strange. they refused to answer 
> how the measured the EIN for the 788, by the way.
>
> well, i will test a 788 against a 702 and a SQN5s in the future..
>
> (by the way, i tested a zaxcom nomad against a 702. if anyone is 
> interested in the results, i can post them..)




Messages in this topic (12)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
2. Recordings from Botswana
    Posted by: "Daan Hendriks"  daan_humanworkshop
    Date: Tue Aug 25, 2015 1:43 pm ((PDT))

Hi all,

I've shared a few sounds online from a recent camping & road trip through
Botswana, Namibia & South Africa, if you're interested and also would like
to read about what it's like to go camping & recording in Bots then have a
read/look/listen here:

http://daanhendriks.co.uk/wildlife-nature-sound-recording/camping-and-recording-in-botswana/

I'll put a similar one up with recordings from Namibia & South Africa later
this week.

Thanks,
Daan




Messages in this topic (1)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
3. field laptop for hydrophone recordings?
    Posted by: "Jodi Gronborg"  gronborgj
    Date: Tue Aug 25, 2015 5:13 pm ((PDT))

Greetings! I am planning to buy (have grant $) a field laptop for my final
dissertation research season. It has been frustrating to get back to the
lab and finally get to look at my hard-earned recordings only to find the
charge amplifier overloaded in the midst of a sweep (thereby rendering
frequency profile lost) or not seeing what I thought I heard. This is my
final season to get all the data I need, and I can't risk it again.

1. Can I record directly onto a field lap top from a hydrophone?  My
original recording set up was hydrophone to charge amplifier to line-in
(not mic-in) jack of Olympus LS11.

I am currently considering a Panasonic, either Toughbook 19 or Toughpad
FZ-G1. Only has one jack, but perhaps within the OS I can modify the
properties for the mic jack?

2. If I can't directly record for all of any of my components (underwater
anuran chorus recordings and/or frequency sweeps), at least being able to
transfer the SD card to a computer and listen and look at the file in
acoustic analysis software on site would be crucial.

Some of my sites are distant and when the frogs will show up and do their
thing is hard if not impossible to predict, so I get back to the lab and
don't have what I need I may not get another chance.

All and any advice is welcome.

Jodi Gronborg
PhD candidate, Zelick Lab
Portland State University
503.725.2401




Messages in this topic (1)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
4. SQN 5s
    Posted by: "emil klotzsch"  onomatopoetik
    Date: Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:35 am ((PDT))

hi,
i was told by a trusted source, that he was not satisfied with the SQN5s mixer, 
regarding sound (not self noise), and build quality.
i would love to get some more opinion on that. anyone has something to say 
about the SQN5s?
looking at the specs, it seems that the self noise is in the same ballpark as 
the 7er recorders..

thanks!
emil






Messages in this topic (1)



"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
     
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Nature Recordists] Digest Number 6457, naturerecordists@yahoogroups.com <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU