naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ultrasonic microphone array

Subject: Re: Ultrasonic microphone array
From: madl74
Date: Wed Oct 15, 2014 7:18 am ((PDT))
> What arer the advantages of an array? Wouldn't the beam width be extremel=
y narrow?

Greg,

II was wondering that as well. I have experimented with a parabolic
reflector for bat detectors. It gave directionality but the gain was not
helpful as aiming the rig was difficult because the bats were too mobile to=

follow.

There was an increase in gain, but in practice the absorption of ultrasound=

in air is the dominant effect on range. The limit for bat detectors with
Lesser Horseshoe bats is about 5 to 8 metres after which an increase in
sensitivity is not much help. I once estimated that the sound pressure
levels in a bat's vocal tract is near atmospheric pressure so their calls
are near the absolute limit.

I have an Anabat detector with a mic diameter of about 2 cm which is
strongly directional at the higher bat frequencies.

The array spacing appears about the same order as the wavelength at 40KHz.=

This suggests that the centre lobe over 8 units is only a few degrees wide=

with a series of surrounding lobes.

It would be interesting to know how the increased sensitivity of the array=

responded to the thermal noise of the air. This rises with frequency and
sets a limit to useful ultrasonic mic sensitivity.

David Brinicombe








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU