[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Anthropophony redux

Subject: Re: Anthropophony redux
From: rock_scallop
Date: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:26 pm ((PDT))
I like "anthropophony," and it may be an appropriate correction from 
"anthrophony,"  but I am wondering now, is it a little too late? - especially 
after years of your public promotions. In a way, it reminds me of the technical 
name change from "Pacific tree frog" to "Pacific chorus frog." Almost everyone 
still says "tree frog." You kind of have to allow what has become popular, even 
when another way has been shown to be technically better suited. 

John Hartog

"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU