-121.98158740997314
Make every garden a wildlife habitat
**************************************
Listen to the Birds and the Bees at
http://naturesound.libsyn.org/
------------------------------------------------
View a Nature Recordists Blog!
http://naturesound.org/Blog/Blog.html
https://www.facebook.com/pages/NaturesoundorgMartyn-Stewart/270743161947?re=
f=3Dsgm
Follow me on AudioBoo
feed://audioboo.fm/users/31466/boos.atom
Listen to my sounds on Facebook:
http://tinyurl.com/ye2dw7p
My dropbox for files:
https://dropbox.yousendit.com/Naturesound
P please consider the environment before printing this email
On Apr 14, 2014, at 5:35 PM, peter wrote:
> Hi Martin
>
>
> I never said the Sony D50=92s pre-amp are better than the SD=92s. I made =
that statement about the AETA Mixy=92s pre-amps.
> Just google around and you will see that almost everyone rates the AETA=
=92s preamps over the SD=92s.
>
> When it comes to personal experience, I can share this: I went to China a=
couple of weeks ago for a new recording project and because I wanted to do=
multitrack recordings I rented an SD 664. I also took my D50-Mixy set-up a=
nd was using both while there. I can honestly say that there=92s no sound q=
uality difference between the Mixy and the SD 664. Moreover, the SD is a be=
ast that weighs a ton and after a day of walking around with it slung over =
my shoulder, my back and shoulders were aching for my light Mixy-D50 setup.
> I will use the SD again in the future, no doubt about it. It=92s a great =
machine. But when you want high quality and portability, my Mixy - D50 setu=
p equals it.
>
> Also, don=92t forget the Mixy costs as much or more than a SD 702, so no =
wonder it=92s high quality.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 15 Apr 2014, at 9:52 am, <> <>=
wrote:
>
>> John, here a recording I made using 3+3 EM172 parallel connected PIP on =
Roland R05. https://v2-staging-nickf.soundcloud.com/marco-pesente/soundscap=
e-with-telinga-dish Marco Pesente
>>
>
>
>
|