I'm sure there's plenty of other options. You just need to make sure the mi=
c is suspended from two points as with the blimp. If not it won't sit prope=
rly and dangle around.
Also, it's quite heavy and has no low cut switch so you might have a lot of=
handling noise..
Good luck!
On 17 Jul 2013, at 10:50, David Shepherd wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Thanks, I have looked at that. I was just trying to find a cheaper option=
using the Rode 'dead cat' and a shock mount but if it turns out that that =
is the only option then I guess I'll go with that.
> David
>
> ________________________________
> Von: peter <>
> An:
> Gesendet: 0:13 Mittwoch, 17.Juli 2013
> Betreff: Re: [Nature Recordists] Shock Mount for Rode NT4
>
>
> Hi David
>
> I'd say that the minimum you need for a Rode NT4 in the field is the Blim=
p. http://www.rodemic.com/accessories/blimp
> And even then, I've found it hard to walk around with while recording.
>
> Peter
>
> On 16 Jul 2013, at 15:37, David Shepherd wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just bought a Rode NT4 together with a Rode SM4 shock mount, howev=
er this is not suitable for recording in the field as the slightest movemen=
t tips the microphone over as it uses a friction mount.
> >
> > I am wondering about the Rode SM3 with does at least have a thread that=
you can tighten.
> >
> > Does anyone have any suggestions, I want to be able to walk while I rec=
ord so it needs to be fairly secure.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
|