| Subject: | Re: Tascam DR-60D |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robin" robin_parmar_sound |
| Date: | Sat Jun 8, 2013 8:22 am ((PDT)) |
Gregory O'Drobinak wrote: > The EIN level is not that good. > 2 dB worse than than the Sony PCM M10, 5dB worse that the LS-100 and 7 dB= worse > than the DR-680. EIN of Sony M10 is -122dB, so 2dB worse would indeed be the claimed 120dB. = In any case, "seems a perfect fit for the target market segment" as my last= message stated. You're right that this may not be sufficient for certain n= ature recording, but still a darned sight better than the Zooms discussed i= n a parallel thread. I am happy to see Tascam thinking outside the box to target the needs of th= e video market. Of course there are lot more film sound recordists than nat= ure recordists. -- Robin Parmar |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone have a modified DR680?, Luis do Carmo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone have a modified DR680?, H=E5kan Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tascam DR-60D, Gregory O'Drobinak |
| Next by Thread: | Bernie Krause and TED, Martyn Stewart |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU