naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

4. Re: speaking of fetch

Subject: 4. Re: speaking of fetch
From: "Avocet" madl74
Date: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:19 am ((PDT))
> Here is what I got from a Great Spotted Woodpecker:
>
> http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/bsp4.mp3

Raimund,

That's a great recording, You can hear the whole tree resonating.

(Now with technical hat on)

I looked for Sennheiser HF noise on a power spectrum. This is a
characteristic tip-up above 10KHz due to thermal noise which is as low
as you can get. The mic hiss just below this frequency is about 55dB
below the unfiltered background noise and about 80dB below the
woodpecker. That is some going by a large margin.

With a cheaper mic and 10dB more noise, that mic noise would be still
below audible limits. This suggests that for much of our time, good
technique beats mic specs by a large margin and we can get too hung up
on manufacturer's figures instead of just getting out recording. I
will have to be content with my MKH-416's 13dB(A) noise figure. :-)

Thanks again for the recording. I haven't heard s convincing
explanation for how a woodpecker avoids brain damage and that was some
thumping.

David

David Brinicombe
North Devon, UK
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU