naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: was: What is a good nature sound reco=

To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: was: What is a good nature sound reco=
From: Klas Strandberg [
rding?

                                    =





I'm sorry for contributing to "mess" here and thank you, Raimund and
  John, for correcting me.

  I meant to talk of electrets (microphone elements) in general and
  fet's in general, (like 2sk170) but included EM172 e.t.c. which do
  not have fet=B4s "in general" but more complex circuits.

  Primo spec'a are not very accurate, on the other hand they are
  usually poorer than actual data.

  I get -6db (+/- 0,5db) when adding a 3,6k resistor over the output of
  John's battery box.

  Klas.

  At 12:27 2012-12-30, you wrote:
  > > An electret like EM172 is not a complete circuit. It has a very high
  > > open circuit impedance, on the other hand it doesn't work, so it is
  > > not relevant to talk about "impedance".
  > > To make it work, a resistor is needed between the drain of the FET
  > > and + of the battery and
  >
  >I agree
  >
  > > then the circuit gets the same (approx.)
  > > output impedance as the resistor! So John's circuit will have a
  > > output impedance of approx. 6.8k.
  >
  >Hmmm, the output impedance of the complete circuit it created by
  >both that 6.8 k ohms resistor AND the impedance between the "GND"
  >and "HOT" pads of the capsule. That impedance is the sum of the
  >internal source resistor and the source-drain impedance of the
  >internal transistor, which is deterimed by the operating point of
  >the FET (which in turn is determined by many different variables
  >such as the supply voltage and both the source and drain resistors.
  >In any case, the output impedance of the entire electret mic circuit
  >should always be significantly lower than the drain resistor (less
  >than 6.8k in this example).
  >
  > > As the input impedance of the LS-11 is only 2k, it means that less
  > > than 1/4 of the signal level remains.
  >
  >I would guess it would be a bit more because the mic output
  >impedance is less than 6.8k (maybe half of that).
  >
  > > Raimund:
  > > 1/ What do we know about the LS-11 input impedance with and without
  > > plug in power?
  >
  >No, I never cared out that.
  >
  > > 2/ Do we know that it is a resistor?
  >
  >Yes, I think that it is a simple resistor. If I remeber correctly,
  >someone already created an Excel spreadsheet on that for a number of
  >different recorders, but I can't find it at the moement.
  >
  > > Also: When reading the specs of electret microphones, you have to
  > > have a look at the "test-circuit"  diagram. If Primo says that a
  > > EM-172 has an "output impedance" of 2.4k, it is because they have
  > > used 2.4k in the test circuit.
  >
  >The EM172 specification
  >(http://www.frogloggers.com/Documents/EM172.pdf?cat=3D13&en=3D1)
  >provides this information:
  >
  >"Impedance : 2.4 k=C6=92=C2=B6 }30 " at 1 kHz (RL3.9 k=C6=92=C2=B6)"
  >
  >As far as I understand it, it just means that they used a 3.9 k
  >resistor (and a supply voltage of 5 V) in their test circuit that
  >results in a output impedance of the test circuit of only 2.4k.
  >
  >Regards,
  >Raimund
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >------------------------------------
  >
  >"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
  >sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause=
.
  >
  >Yahoo! Groups Links
  >
  >
  >
  Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
  S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
  Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
  email: 
  website: www.telinga.com



                              =

                               =









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: was: What is a good nature sound reco=, Klas Strandberg [mailto:telinga <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU