Subject: | 7. Re: Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Sun Dec 23, 2012 6:40 pm ((PST)) |
> I'm not sure if I've understood all this, but if weighting is critical to= knowing what a noise figure will mean for a particular application, wouldn= 't it be better for manufacturers to abandon the quest for a single noise f= igure, and supply graphs of noise instead? Or would that make it too hard t= o sell equipment, with the public unable to decide how to compare graphs? Geez, I went to the Shure site the other day to get some specs, and they're= not even quoting noise specs, let alone showing frequency response graphs = or directivity plots. We're in an age of dumbed-down audio, folks. Bad news= , because it's a technical craft. -Dan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 6. Re: Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks, Peter Shute |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 8. Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks, Robin |
Previous by Thread: | 7. Re: Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | 8. Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks, John Crockett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU