naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks

Subject: 3. Re: Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks
From: "Klas Strandberg" klasstrandberg
Date: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:23 pm ((PST))
On this list, the word "gain" has been used in many various ways, two 
are more common and it gets very confusing.

1/ Professional people mostly mean by "gain" that it is the amount of 
amplification that a amplifier is been set to, as 60, 50, 40, 30 etc 
db. That is one thing.

2/ When talking about consumer products, we often mean by "gain" the 
maximum gain, like "high sensitivity" and "the wheel" at ten. The 
wheel, is then a open potentiometer. When being closed, from 10 to 0, 
it shortens the output of the mic preamp to ground and we will have a 
linear relationship between "gain" and noise. When the potentiometer 
is shorting the signal to ground, also the preamp noise will be 
shortened to ground. This is vice versa from the professional 
concept, where noise increases, as you turn down the gain.

We have to talk about one concept at a time.

Klas.

At 17:22 2012-12-21, you wrote:
> >> I also added calculations so that if one knows any two of the
> >> parameters one can calculate the third.
> >
> >> 1) EIN (dBu)
> >> 2) Self Noise (dB SPL)
> >> 3) Sensitivity (mV/Pa)
> >
> > Yes, these are comparable but only if the base definitions are the
> > same. I have seen different reference levels used by different
> > manufacturers which doesn't help with a global comparison of mics.
>
>The references are quoted above. I prefer sensitivity quoted in dBu 
>for 1 Pa, because then everything is in dB.
>
> > 1) EIN is the sound level entering the mic which would be equivalent
> > to the total noises generated internally by the mic. Put another way,
> > it is the acoustic sound level which increases the mic output by 3dB
> > over the mic noise level. (The dB addition of equal random sounds.)
> >
> > EIN provides, or should provide, a comparison between the internal
> > noise generated by different mics, irrespective of how they are
> > connected or the volume setting of a recorder.
>
>Sorry, David, but EIN has nothing to do with microphones. It's the 
>noise of the mic preamp when terminated by the specified source 
>impedance (150 ohms). The Rane article follows.
>
>-Dan
>
>EIN. Equivalent Input Noise or Input Referred Noise
>
>What is tested? Equivalent input noise, or input referred noise, is 
>how noise is spec'd on mixing consoles, standalone mic preamps and 
>other signal processing units with mic inputs. The problem in 
>measuring mixing consoles (and all mic preamps) is knowing ahead of 
>time how much gain is going to be used. The mic stage itself is the 
>dominant noise generator; therefore, the output noise is almost 
>totally determined by the amount of gain: turn the gain up, and the 
>output noise goes up accordingly. Thus, the EIN is the amount of 
>noise added to the input signal. Both are then amplified to obtain 
>the final output signal.
>
>For example, say your mixer has an EIN of -130 dBu. This means the 
>noise is 130 dB below a reference point of 0.775 volts (0 dBu). If 
>your microphone puts out, say, -50 dBu under normal conditions, then 
>the S/N at the input to the mic preamp is 80 dB (i.e., the added 
>noise is 80 dB below the input signal). This is uniquely determined 
>by the magnitude of the input signal and the EIN. From here on out, 
>turning up the gain increases both the signal and the noise by the same amount.
>
>How is it measured? With the gain set for maximum and the input 
>terminated with the expected source impedance, the output noise is 
>measured with an rms voltmeter fitted with a bandwidth or weighting filter.
>
>Required Conditions. This is a spec where test conditions are 
>critical. It is very easy to deceive without them. Since high-gain 
>mic stages greatly amplify source noise, the terminating input 
>resistance must be stated. Two equally quiet inputs will measure 
>vastly different if not using the identical input impedance. The 
>standard source impedance is 150 ohms. As unintuitive as it may be, 
>a plain resistor, hooked up to nothing, generates noise, and the 
>larger the resistor value the greater the noise. It is called 
>thermal noise or Johnson noise (after its discoverer J. B. Johnson, 
>in 1928) and results from the motion of electron charge of the atoms 
>making up the resistor. All that moving about is called thermal 
>agitation (caused by heat -- the hotter the resistor, the noisier).
>
>The input terminating resistor defines the lower limit of noise 
>performance. In use, a mic stage cannot be quieter than the source. 
>A trick which unscrupulous manufacturers may use is to spec their 
>mic stage with the input shorted -- a big no-no, since it does not 
>represent the real performance of the preamp.
>
>The next biggie in spec'ing the EIN of mic stages is bandwidth. This 
>same thermal noise limit of the input terminating resistance is a 
>strong function of measurement bandwidth. For example, the noise 
>voltage generated by the standard 150 ohm input resistor, measured 
>over a bandwidth of 20 kHz (and room temperature) is -131 dBu, i.e., 
>you cannot have an operating mic stage, with a 150 ohm source, 
>quieter than -131 dBu. However, if you use only a 10 kHz bandwidth, 
>then the noise drops to -134 dBu, a big 3 dB improvement. (For those 
>paying close attention: it is not 6 dB like you might expect since 
>the bandwidth is half. It is a square root function, so it is 
>reduced by the square root of one-half, or 0.707, which is 3 dB less).
>
>Since the measured output noise is such a strong function of 
>bandwidth and gain, it is recommended to use no weighting filters. 
>They only complicate comparison among manufacturers. Remember: if a 
>manufacturer's reported EIN seems too good to be true, look for the 
>details. They may not be lying, only using favorable conditions to deceive.
>
>Correct: EIN = -130 dBu, 22 kHz BW, max gain, Rs = 150 ohms
>
>Wrong: EIN = -130 dBu
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
website: www.telinga.com
         








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU