Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?

Subject:	Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?
From:	"Peter Shute" pshute2
Date:	Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:53 pm ((PST))

If there was no information about it then I'd hope it was free from any man=
ipulation, other than perhaps fade in/out. But I wouldn't assume that was t=
rue for sure unless it actually said so.

Based on what? Hope, trust, reputation?

Peter Shute

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
>  On Behalf Of Klas Strandberg
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 11:47 AM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] was: What is a good nature
> sound recording?
>
>
>
> Keith,
> Still thinking. I will come back to you.
>
> First: I wish I could make a poll on this list:
>
> "When you hear a Telinga SSM demo track at the Telinga site
> or SoundCloud, and there is no information about it, do you
> presume that...
>
> 1/ the track is raw, free from any kind of manipulation, or
> 2/ a end result, post produced to give the best sound?
>
> And based on what?
>
> Klas.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Peter Shute <= Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Avocet

Previous by Date:	Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Klas Strandberg
Next by Date:	Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Avocet
Previous by Thread:	1. Re: xeno-canto update, wimmel3
Next by Thread:	Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Avocet
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU