[Top] [All Lists]

4. Re: R-44 issue-geek reply

Subject: 4. Re: R-44 issue-geek reply
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:00 am ((PDT))
oh sure. I have used, get to use most recorders on the market from the chea=
pest to the most expensive & each one with have quirks. At entry / pro-sume=
r level, these are more obvious but I did expect that the Roland recorders =
would be at least able to handle mics as common as the DPA. They should imo=


--- In  "Raimund" <> wrot=
> > in that case I remain somewhat puzzled - the Roland recorders aren't ch=
eap & tacky units. Why they should have not such good design is odd indeed.
> Jez, there are usually numerous pitfalls in such complex electronic devic=
es containing both analog and digital components and it is often quite diff=
icult even for the most talented engineers to manage all these problems.
> I think you will find issues on any recorder as long as you dig deep enou=
gh ;-)
> Regards,
> Raimund

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU